Findings

What do systematic reviews say?

6 questions · 6 findings · 1 reviews

Sort:Best matchNewest Highest certainty Download CSV

No studies found 0 · 0%GRADE not reported 2 · 33.3%Very low 2 · 33.3%Low 1 · 16.7%Moderate 1 · 16.7%High 0 · 0%

Tubal flushing with oil‐soluble contrast media (OSCM) vs water‐soluble contrast media (WSCM)

Live birth · women with subfertility

1 finding from 1 review

Tubal flushing for subfertility 2020 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
3 studies · 2035 participants
GRADE not reported

Tubal flushing with oil‐soluble contrast media (OSCM) vs water‐soluble contrast media (WSCM)

Clinical pregnancy · women with subfertility

Tubal flushing with oil‐soluble contrast media (OSCM) may leads to higher clinical pregnancy compared with water‐soluble contrast media (WSCM) (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Tubal flushing for subfertility 2020 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
OR 1.42 [1.1, 1.85]
6 studies · 2598 participants
Low

Tubal flushing with oil‐soluble contrast media (OSCM) vs water‐soluble contrast media (WSCM)

Intravasation · women with subfertility

Tubal flushing with oil‐soluble contrast media (OSCM) probably leads to higher intravasation compared with water‐soluble contrast media (WSCM) (moderate certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Tubal flushing for subfertility 2020 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
OR 5 [2.25, 11.12]
4 studies · 1912 participants
Moderate

Tubal flushing with oil‐soluble contrast media (OSCM) vs water‐soluble contrast media (WSCM)

Infection · women with subfertility

It is very uncertain whether tubal flushing with oil‐soluble contrast media (OSCM) changes infection compared with water‐soluble contrast media (WSCM) (very low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Tubal flushing for subfertility 2020 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
OR 0.22 [0.04, 1.22]
2 studies · 662 participants
Very low

Tubal flushing with oil‐soluble contrast media (OSCM) vs water‐soluble contrast media (WSCM)

Haemorrhage · women with subfertility

It is very uncertain whether tubal flushing with oil‐soluble contrast media (OSCM) changes haemorrhage compared with water‐soluble contrast media (WSCM) (very low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Tubal flushing for subfertility 2020 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
OR 0.65 [0.4, 1.06]
2 studies · 662 participants
Very low

Tubal flushing with oil‐soluble contrast media (OSCM) vs water‐soluble contrast media (WSCM)

Congenital abnormalities · women with subfertility

1 finding from 1 review

Tubal flushing for subfertility 2020 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
1 study · 1119 participants
GRADE not reported