evidencegaps
Findings

What do systematic reviews say?

Refine by population, intervention, comparison or outcome
More filters
Evidence found and GRADE certainty

4 questions · 4 findings · 1 reviews

Sort:Best matchNewestHighest certaintyDownload CSV
No studies found 0 · 0%GRADE not reported 0 · 0%Very low 0 · 0%Low 4 · 100%Moderate 0 · 0%High 0 · 0%

Thromboelastography (TEG) or thromboelastometry (ROTEM) vs standard laboratory test (SLT)‐guided transfusion

Proportion of patients receiving FFP · adults or children with bleeding

Thromboelastography (TEG) or thromboelastometry (ROTEM) showed no clear difference in proportion of patients receiving FFP compared with standard laboratory test (SLT)‐guided transfusion (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Thromboelastography (TEG) or thromboelastometry (ROTEM) vs any comparison

Proportion of patients receiving FFP · adults or children with bleeding

Thromboelastography (TEG) or thromboelastometry (ROTEM) may leads to lower proportion of patients receiving FFP compared with any comparison (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Thromboelastography (TEG) or thromboelastometry (ROTEM) vs clinical judgement or usual care

Proportion of patients receiving FFP · adults or children with bleeding

Thromboelastography (TEG) or thromboelastometry (ROTEM) may leads to lower proportion of patients receiving FFP compared with clinical judgement or usual care (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Thromboelastography (TEG) or thromboelastometry (ROTEM) in combination with SLT or other devices vs clinical judgement or usual care

Proportion of patients receiving FFP · adults or children with bleeding

Thromboelastography (TEG) or thromboelastometry (ROTEM) in… showed no clear difference in proportion of patients receiving FFP compared with clinical judgement or usual care (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review