Findings

What do systematic reviews say?

3 questions · 3 findings · 1 reviews

Sort:Best matchNewest Highest certainty Download CSV

No studies found 0 · 0%GRADE not reported 0 · 0%Very low 0 · 0%Low 3 · 100%Moderate 0 · 0%High 0 · 0%

Temsirolimus vs IFN‐α (targeted agent versus classic immunotherapy)

Serious adverse events (Grade 3 or 4) · Treatment‐naïve metastatic renal cell carcinoma (any cell type)

Temsirolimus may leads to lower serious adverse events (Grade 3 or 4) compared with IFN‐α (targeted agent versus classic immunotherapy) (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Targeted therapy for metastatic renal cell carcinoma 2020 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
RR 0.86 [0.76, 0.97]
1 study · 408 participants
Low

Temsirolimus + IFN‐α vs IFN (+ placebo) (targeted agent + classic immunotherapy versus classic immunotherapy)

Serious adverse events (Grade 3 or 4) · Treatment‐naïve metastatic renal cell carcinoma (any cell type)

Temsirolimus + IFN‐α may leads to higher serious adverse events (Grade 3 or 4) compared with IFN‐α (targeted agent + classic immunotherapy versus classic… (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Targeted therapy for metastatic renal cell carcinoma 2020 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
RR 1.12 [1.02, 1.22]
1 study · 408 participants
Low

Temsirolimus + bevacizumab vs bevacizumab + IFN‐α (targeted agent + targeted agent versus targeted agent + classic immunotherapy)

Serious adverse events (Grade 3 or 4) · Treatment‐naïve metastatic renal cell carcinoma (any cell type)

Temsirolimus + bevacizumab showed no clear difference in serious adverse events (Grade 3 or 4) compared with bevacizumab + IFN‐α (targeted agent + targeted agent versus targeted… (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Targeted therapy for metastatic renal cell carcinoma 2020 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
RR 1.05 [0.98, 1.13]
1 study · 784 participants
Low