Findings

What do systematic reviews say?

Refine by population, intervention, comparison or outcome
More filters
Evidence found and GRADE certainty

32 questions · 32 findings · 1 reviews

No studies found 4 · 12.5%GRADE not reported 0 · 0%Very low 0 · 0%Low 7 · 21.9%Moderate 18 · 56.3%High 3 · 9.4%

Target of rapamycin inhibitors (TOR‐I) vs calcineurin inhibitors (CNI): secondary outcomes

New onset of diabetes · primary immunosuppression in kidney transplant recipients

Target of rapamycin inhibitors (TOR‐I) showed no clear difference in new‐onset diabetes mellitus compared with calcineurin inhibitors (CNI): secondary outcomes (moderate certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Target of rapamycin inhibitors (TOR‐I) vs calcineurin inhibitors (CNI): secondary outcomes

Lymphoma/PTLD · primary immunosuppression in kidney transplant recipients

Target of rapamycin inhibitors (TOR‐I) showed no clear difference in lymphoma/PTLD compared with calcineurin inhibitors (CNI): secondary outcomes (moderate certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Target of rapamycin inhibitors (TOR‐I) vs calcineurin inhibitors (CNI): secondary outcomes

Tremor · primary immunosuppression in kidney transplant recipients

Target of rapamycin inhibitors (TOR‐I) leads to lower tremor compared with calcineurin inhibitors (CNI): secondary outcomes (high certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Target of rapamycin inhibitors (TOR‐I) vs calcineurin inhibitors (CNI): secondary outcomes

Thrombocytopenia · primary immunosuppression in kidney transplant recipients

Target of rapamycin inhibitors (TOR‐I) may leads to higher thrombocytopenia compared with calcineurin inhibitors (CNI): secondary outcomes (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Target of rapamycin inhibitors (TOR‐I) vs calcineurin inhibitors (CNI): main outcomes

Death (all causes) · primary immunosuppression in kidney transplant recipients

Target of rapamycin inhibitors (TOR‐I) showed no clear difference in death (all causes) compared with calcineurin inhibitors (CNI): main outcomes (moderate certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Target of rapamycin inhibitors (TOR‐I) vs calcineurin inhibitors (CNI): main outcomes

Graft loss censored for death · primary immunosuppression in kidney transplant recipients

Target of rapamycin inhibitors (TOR‐I) showed no clear difference in graft loss censored for death compared with calcineurin inhibitors (CNI): main outcomes (moderate certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Target of rapamycin inhibitors (TOR‐I) vs calcineurin inhibitors (CNI): main outcomes

Biopsy‐proven acute rejection · primary immunosuppression in kidney transplant recipients

Target of rapamycin inhibitors (TOR‐I) probably leads to higher biopsy‐proven acute rejection compared with calcineurin inhibitors (CNI): main outcomes (moderate certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Target of rapamycin inhibitors (TOR‐I) vs calcineurin inhibitors (CNI): main outcomes

CMV infection · primary immunosuppression in kidney transplant recipients

Target of rapamycin inhibitors (TOR‐I) leads to lower CMV infection compared with calcineurin inhibitors (CNI): main outcomes (high certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Target of rapamycin inhibitors (TOR‐I) vs calcineurin inhibitors (CNI): main outcomes

Wound complications · primary immunosuppression in kidney transplant recipients

Target of rapamycin inhibitors (TOR‐I) probably leads to higher adverse wound outcomes: all complications compared with calcineurin inhibitors (CNI): main outcomes (moderate certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Target of rapamycin inhibitors (TOR‐I) vs calcineurin inhibitors (CNI): main outcomes

All malignancies · primary immunosuppression in kidney transplant recipients

Target of rapamycin inhibitors (TOR‐I) showed no clear difference in all malignancies compared with calcineurin inhibitors (CNI): main outcomes (moderate certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Target of rapamycin inhibitors (TOR‐I) vs calcineurin inhibitors (CNI): main outcomes

Number needing to change treatment · primary immunosuppression in kidney transplant recipients

Target of rapamycin inhibitors (TOR‐I) probably leads to higher number needing to change treatment compared with calcineurin inhibitors (CNI): main outcomes (moderate certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Target of rapamycin inhibitors (TOR‐I) vs antimetabolites: primary outcomes

Death (all causes) · primary immunosuppression in kidney transplant recipients

Target of rapamycin inhibitors (TOR‐I) showed no clear difference in death (all causes) compared with antimetabolites: primary outcomes (moderate certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Target of rapamycin inhibitors (TOR‐I) vs antimetabolites: primary outcomes

Graft loss (censored) · primary immunosuppression in kidney transplant recipients

Target of rapamycin inhibitors (TOR‐I) showed no clear difference in graft loss (censored) compared with antimetabolites: primary outcomes (moderate certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Target of rapamycin inhibitors (TOR‐I) vs antimetabolites: primary outcomes

Biopsy‐proven acute rejection · primary immunosuppression in kidney transplant recipients

Target of rapamycin inhibitors (TOR‐I) showed no clear difference in biopsy‐proven acute rejection compared with antimetabolites: primary outcomes (moderate certainty).

1 finding from 1 review