Findings

What do systematic reviews say?

4 questions · 4 findings · 1 reviews

Sort:Best matchNewest Highest certainty Download CSV

No studies found 1 · 25%GRADE not reported 0 · 0%Very low 2 · 50%Low 1 · 25%Moderate 0 · 0%High 0 · 0%

Surgical thrombectomy vs different types of endovascular interventions

Technical success · thrombosed haemodialysis arteriovenous fistulas and grafts

It is very uncertain whether surgical thrombectomy changes technical success compared with different types of endovascular interventions (very low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Interventions for thrombosed haemodialysis arteriovenous fistulas and grafts 2024 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
RR 1.15 [0.94, 1.41]
1 study · 115 participants
Very low

Surgical thrombectomy vs mechanical thrombectomy

Technical success · thrombosed haemodialysis arteriovenous fistulas and grafts

Surgical thrombectomy showed no clear difference in technical success compared with mechanical thrombectomy (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Interventions for thrombosed haemodialysis arteriovenous fistulas and grafts 2024 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
RR 0.97 [0.85, 1.1]
2 studies · 251 participants
Low

Surgical thrombectomy vs pulse spray technique

Technical success · thrombosed haemodialysis arteriovenous fistulas and grafts

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review

Interventions for thrombosed haemodialysis arteriovenous fistulas and grafts 2024 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found

Surgical thrombectomy vs continuous infusion

Technical success · thrombosed haemodialysis arteriovenous fistulas and grafts

It is very uncertain whether surgical thrombectomy changes technical Success compared with continuous infusion (very low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Interventions for thrombosed haemodialysis arteriovenous fistulas and grafts 2024 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
RR 1.41 [0.96, 2.06]
1 study · 31 participants
Very low