Findings

What do systematic reviews say?

5 questions · 5 findings · 1 reviews · Oral Health

No studies found 3 · 60%GRADE not reported 0 · 0%Very low 2 · 40%Low 0 · 0%Moderate 0 · 0%High 0 · 0%

Disease-free survival · Adults with oral cavity or oropharyngeal cancer

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review

Interventions for the treatment of oral cavity and oropharyngeal cancers: surgical treatment 2023 · Cochrane All outcomes
oral cavity
Disease-free survival: not reported (Iyer 2015).
0 studies
No studies found

Total mortality · Adults with oral cavity or oropharyngeal cancer

1 finding from 1 review

Interventions for the treatment of oral cavity and oropharyngeal cancers: surgical treatment 2023 · Cochrane All outcomes
oral cavity
Total mortality: study reported survival significantly better with surgery and RT vs chemoradiotherapy, but no useable data; 32 participants (1 RCT, Iyer 2015 oral cavity subgroup).
1 study · 32 participants
Very low

Adverse events associated with treatment · Adults with oral cavity or oropharyngeal cancer

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review

Interventions for the treatment of oral cavity and oropharyngeal cancers: surgical treatment 2023 · Cochrane All outcomes
Adverse events: not reported for any participants (Iyer 2015).
0 studies
No studies found

Recurrence · Adults with oral cavity or oropharyngeal cancer

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review

Interventions for the treatment of oral cavity and oropharyngeal cancers: surgical treatment 2023 · Cochrane All outcomes
oral cavity
Recurrence: not reported for the oral cancer subgroup (Iyer 2015).
0 studies
No studies found

Locoregional recurrence · Adults with oral cavity or oropharyngeal cancer

1 finding from 1 review

Interventions for the treatment of oral cavity and oropharyngeal cancers: surgical treatment 2023 · Cochrane All outcomes
oral cavity
Locoregional recurrence: reported difference between groups not statistically significant (P=0.355), but no useable data; 32 participants (1 RCT, Iyer 2015).
1 study · 32 participants
Very low