Findings

What do systematic reviews say?

Refine by population, intervention, comparison or outcome
More filters
Evidence found and GRADE certainty

13 questions · 13 findings · 2 reviews

No studies found 9 · 69.2%GRADE not reported 0 · 0%Very low 3 · 23.1%Low 1 · 7.7%Moderate 0 · 0%High 0 · 0%

Suprapubic catheterisation vs intermittent urethral catheterisation

Number of participants with symptomatic UTI · Patients with short‐term bladder drainage

Suprapubic catheterisation showed no clear difference in number of participants with symptomatic UTI compared with intermittent urethral catheterisation (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Suprapubic catheterisation vs intermittent self‐catheterisation

Adverse events (acute complication after surgery)

It is very uncertain whether suprapubic catheterisation changes adverse events (acute complication after surgery) compared with intermittent self‐catheterisation (very low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Suprapubic catheterisation vs intermittent self‐catheterisation

Urinary tract infection

It is very uncertain whether suprapubic catheterisation changes urinary tract infections in the first month after surgery compared with intermittent self‐catheterisation (very low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review