Findings

What do systematic reviews say?

6 questions · 6 findings · 1 reviews

Sort:Best matchNewest Highest certainty Download CSV

No studies found 4 · 66.7%GRADE not reported 0 · 0%Very low 1 · 16.7%Low 1 · 16.7%Moderate 0 · 0%High 0 · 0%

Suprapubic catheterisation vs intermittent urethral catheterisation

Number of participants with symptomatic UTI · Patients with short‐term bladder drainage

Suprapubic catheterisation showed no clear difference in number of participants with symptomatic UTI compared with intermittent urethral catheterisation (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Urethral (indwelling or intermittent) or suprapubic routes for short‐term catheterisation in hospitalised adults 2015 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
RR 1.67 [0.68, 4.1]
1 study · 72 participants
Low

Suprapubic catheterisation vs intermittent urethral catheterisation

Asymptomatic bacteruria · Patients with short‐term bladder drainage

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review

Urethral (indwelling or intermittent) or suprapubic routes for short‐term catheterisation in hospitalised adults 2015 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found

Suprapubic catheterisation vs intermittent urethral catheterisation

Number of patients with pain · Patients with short‐term bladder drainage

1 finding from 1 review

Urethral (indwelling or intermittent) or suprapubic routes for short‐term catheterisation in hospitalised adults 2015 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
1 study · 72 participants
Very low

Suprapubic catheterisation vs intermittent urethral catheterisation

Ease of use for participants ‐ not reported · Patients with short‐term bladder drainage

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review

Urethral (indwelling or intermittent) or suprapubic routes for short‐term catheterisation in hospitalised adults 2015 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found

Suprapubic catheterisation vs intermittent urethral catheterisation

Quality of life ‐ not reported · Patients with short‐term bladder drainage

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review

Urethral (indwelling or intermittent) or suprapubic routes for short‐term catheterisation in hospitalised adults 2015 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found

Suprapubic catheterisation vs intermittent urethral catheterisation

Cost utility analysis ‐ not reported · Patients with short‐term bladder drainage

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review

Urethral (indwelling or intermittent) or suprapubic routes for short‐term catheterisation in hospitalised adults 2015 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found