Findings

What do systematic reviews say?

Refine by population, intervention, comparison or outcome
More filters
Evidence found and GRADE certainty

32 questions · 32 findings · 1 reviews

No studies found 3 · 9.4%GRADE not reported 0 · 0%Very low 5 · 15.6%Low 12 · 37.5%Moderate 11 · 34.4%High 1 · 3.1%

Sunitinib vs IFN‐α (targeted agent versus classic immunotherapy)

Progression‐free survival (PSF) · Treatment‐naïve metastatic renal cell carcinoma (clear cell type)

Sunitinib probably leads to lower progression‐free survival (absolute effect size estimates based on… compared with interferon‐α (IFN‐α) (targeted agent versus classic immunotherapy) (moderate certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Sunitinib vs IFN‐α (targeted agent versus classic immunotherapy)

Overall survival (absolute effect size estimates based on survival rate at 24 months) · Treatment‐naïve metastatic renal cell carcinoma (clear cell type)

Sunitinib showed no clear difference in overall survival (absolute effect size estimates based on survival… compared with interferon‐α (IFN‐α) (targeted agent versus classic immunotherapy) (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Sunitinib vs IFN‐α (targeted agent versus classic immunotherapy)

Serious adverse events (Grade 3 or 4) · Treatment‐naïve metastatic renal cell carcinoma (clear cell type)

Sunitinib probably leads to higher serious adverse events (Grade 3 or 4)assessed as: CTCAE v3.0 compared with interferon‐α (IFN‐α) (targeted agent versus classic immunotherapy) (moderate certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Sunitinib vs atezolizumab (targeted therapy versus immunotherapy)

Progression‐free survival · Treatment‐naïve metastatic renal cell carcinoma (clear cell type)

It is very uncertain whether sunitinib changes progression‐free survival (absolute effect size estimates based on… compared with atezolizumab (targeted therapy versus immunotherapy) (very low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Sunitinib vs atezolizumab (targeted therapy versus immunotherapy)

Overall survival (absolute effect size estimates based on survival rate at 24 months) · Treatment‐naïve metastatic renal cell carcinoma (clear cell type)

It is very uncertain whether sunitinib changes overall survival (absolute effect size estimates based on survival… compared with atezolizumab (targeted therapy versus immunotherapy) (very low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Sunitinib vs atezolizumab (targeted therapy versus immunotherapy)

Serious adverse events (Grade 3 or 4) · Treatment‐naïve metastatic renal cell carcinoma (clear cell type)

Sunitinib probably leads to higher serious adverse events (Grade 3 or 4) compared with atezolizumab (targeted therapy versus immunotherapy) (moderate certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Sunitinib vs adjuvant immunotherapy (combined ipilimumab and nivolumab)

Progression‐free survival (PSF) · Treatment‐naïve metastatic renal cell carcinoma (clear cell type); IMDC intermediate, poor risk patients only.

Sunitinib may leads to higher progression‐free survival (absolute effect size estimates based on… compared with nivolumab + ipilimumab (targeted agent versus combinations of… (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Sunitinib vs adjuvant immunotherapy (combined ipilimumab and nivolumab)

Overall survival (absolute effect size estimates based on survival rate at 12 months) · Treatment‐naïve metastatic renal cell carcinoma (clear cell type); IMDC intermediate, poor risk patients only.

Sunitinib leads to higher overall survival (absolute effect size estimates based on survival… compared with nivolumab + ipilimumab (targeted agent versus combinations of… (high certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Sunitinib vs adjuvant immunotherapy (combined ipilimumab and nivolumab)

Serious adverse events (Grade 3 or 4) · Treatment‐naïve metastatic renal cell carcinoma (clear cell type); IMDC intermediate, poor risk patients only.

Sunitinib probably leads to higher serious adverse events (Grade 3 or 4) compared with nivolumab + ipilimumab (targeted agent versus combinations of… (moderate certainty).

1 finding from 1 review