Findings

What do systematic reviews say?

Refine by population, intervention, comparison or outcome
More filters
Evidence found and GRADE certainty

20 questions · 22 findings · 2 reviews · Gynaecological, Neuro-oncology and Orphan Cancer

No studies found 8 · 36.4%GRADE not reported 1 · 4.5%Very low 3 · 13.6%Low 10 · 45.5%Moderate 0 · 0%High 0 · 0%

Intervention diet vs usual on‐treatment diet

Diarrhoea (grade 2+) · People undergoing pelvic radiotherapy for urological, gynaecological or colorectal cancer

Summary of findings: Diet interventions showed no clear difference in diarrhoea (grade 2+) compared with usual on‐treatment diet (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Intervention diet vs usual on‐treatment diet

QoL · People undergoing pelvic radiotherapy for urological, gynaecological or colorectal cancer

Summary of findings: Diet interventions showed no clear difference in QOL scores (IBDQ) (higher scores better) compared with usual on‐treatment diet (low certainty).

3 findings from 1 review

Intervention diet vs usual on‐treatment diet

Diarrhoea (grade 1+) · People undergoing pelvic radiotherapy for urological, gynaecological or colorectal cancer

Summary of findings: Diet interventions showed no clear difference in diarrhoea (grade 1+) compared with usual on‐treatment diet (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Intervention diet vs usual on‐treatment diet

Mean GI symptom scores (Vaizey scale) (higher scores better) · People undergoing pelvic radiotherapy for urological, gynaecological or colorectal cancer

Summary of findings: Diet interventions showed no clear difference in mean GI symptom scores (Vaizey scale) (higher scores better) compared with usual on‐treatment diet (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Lifestyle interventions vs placebo or usual care

Overall survival (24 months) · weight reduction in obesity to improve survival in women with endometrial cancer

It is very uncertain whether summary of findings table ‐ Lifestyle intervention changes overall survival (24 months) compared with usual care compared to placebo (very low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Lifestyle interventions vs placebo or usual care

Adverse events – musculoskeletal · weight reduction in obesity to improve survival in women with endometrial cancer

It is very uncertain whether summary of findings table ‐ Lifestyle intervention changes adverse events – musculoskeletal compared with usual care compared to placebo (very low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Lifestyle interventions vs placebo or usual care

Cardiovascular and metabolic event frequency (12 months) (Number of strokes, myocardial infarctions and hospitalisations for heart failure) · weight reduction in obesity to improve survival in women with endometrial cancer

Summary of findings table ‐ Lifestyle intervention showed no clear difference in cardiovascular and metabolic event frequency (6 months) compared with usual care compared to placebo (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review