Findings

What do systematic reviews say?

Refine by population, intervention, comparison or outcome
More filters
Evidence found and GRADE certainty

8 questions · 8 findings · 1 reviews

No studies found 0 · 0%GRADE not reported 0 · 0%Very low 5 · 62.5%Low 3 · 37.5%Moderate 0 · 0%High 0 · 0%

Summary of findings: Substitutive interventions vs control

Quality of life (Visual Function Questionnaire (VFQ‐25)) After intervention · stroke survivors with visual field defects

Summary of findings: Substitutive interventions showed no clear difference in quality of life (Visual Function Questionnaire (VFQ‐25)) After… compared with control (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Summary of findings: Substitutive interventions vs control

Activities of daily living · stroke survivors with visual field defects

It is very uncertain whether summary of findings: Substitutive interventions changes functional ability in activities of daily living (Barthel Index)… compared with control (very low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Summary of findings: Substitutive interventions vs control

Extended activities of daily living · stroke survivors with visual field defects

It is very uncertain whether summary of findings: Substitutive interventions changes extended activities of daily living (Change in EADL from baseline;… compared with control (very low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Summary of findings: Substitutive interventions vs control

Scanning ‐ cancellation (line cancellation errors) After intervention · stroke survivors with visual field defects

It is very uncertain whether summary of findings: Substitutive interventions changes scanning ‐ cancellation (line cancellation errors) After intervention compared with control (very low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review