Findings

What do systematic reviews say?

7 questions · 7 findings · 1 reviews

Sort:Best matchNewest Highest certainty Download CSV

No studies found 5 · 71.4%GRADE not reported 0 · 0%Very low 2 · 28.6%Low 0 · 0%Moderate 0 · 0%High 0 · 0%

Summary of findings: Restitutive interventions vs control

Visual field · stroke survivors with visual field defects

It is very uncertain whether summary of findings: Restitutive interventions changes visual field (TAP border position in degrees of visual angle from… compared with control (very low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Interventions for visual field defects in people with stroke 2019 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
MD 1.02
1 study · 19 participants
Very low

Summary of findings: Restitutive interventions vs control

Functional ability: independence with activities of daily living at discharge from hospital · stroke survivors with visual field defects

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review

Interventions for visual field defects in people with stroke 2019 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found

Summary of findings: Restitutive interventions vs control

Extended activities of daily living · stroke survivors with visual field defects

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review

Interventions for visual field defects in people with stroke 2019 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found

Summary of findings: Restitutive interventions vs control

Reading ability · stroke survivors with visual field defects

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review

Interventions for visual field defects in people with stroke 2019 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found

Summary of findings: Restitutive interventions vs control

Falls · stroke survivors with visual field defects

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review

Interventions for visual field defects in people with stroke 2019 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found

Summary of findings: Restitutive interventions vs control

Quality of life (improved or not improved ‐ derived from percentage of those who reported subjective improvements of vision) · stroke survivors with visual field defects

It is very uncertain whether summary of findings: Restitutive interventions changes quality of life (improved or not improved ‐ derived from percentage… compared with control (very low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Interventions for visual field defects in people with stroke 2019 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
OR 13 [2.07, 81.48]
1 study · 30 participants
Very low

Summary of findings: Restitutive interventions vs control

Scanning ‐ cancellation · stroke survivors with visual field defects

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review

Interventions for visual field defects in people with stroke 2019 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found