Findings

What do systematic reviews say?

3 questions · 3 findings · 1 reviews · Eyes and Vision

Sort:Best matchNewest Highest certainty Download CSV

No studies found 1 · 33.3%GRADE not reported 0 · 0%Very low 2 · 66.7%Low 0 · 0%Moderate 0 · 0%High 0 · 0%

Steroids with or without azathioprine vs cyclosporine A

Change in BCVA (lower logMAR indicate better vision) · NIIPPU

1 finding from 1 review

Non‐biologic, steroid‐sparing therapies for non‐infectious intermediate, posterior, and panuveitis in adults 2022 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
2 studies · 91 participants
Very low

Steroids with or without azathioprine vs cyclosporine A

Proportion of participants with confirmed macular edema (lower number of events is better) · NIIPPU

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review

Non‐biologic, steroid‐sparing therapies for non‐infectious intermediate, posterior, and panuveitis in adults 2022 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found

Steroids with or without azathioprine vs cyclosporine A

Proportion of participants experiencing complications or requiring cessation of medication (lower number of events is better) · NIIPPU

It is very uncertain whether steroids with or without azathioprine changes proportion of participants experiencing complications or requiring… compared with cyclosporine A (very low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Non‐biologic, steroid‐sparing therapies for non‐infectious intermediate, posterior, and panuveitis in adults 2022 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
RR 0.85 [0.21, 3.45]
2 studies · 91 participants
Very low