Findings

What do systematic reviews say?

Refine by population, intervention, comparison or outcome
More filters
Evidence found and GRADE certainty

38 questions · 41 findings · 4 reviews

No studies found 3 · 7.3%GRADE not reported 0 · 0%Very low 9 · 22%Low 17 · 41.5%Moderate 9 · 22%High 3 · 7.3%

ePTFE‐covered stents vs bare stents

Hepatic encephalopathy · transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt in people with liver cirrhosis

It is very uncertain whether ePTFE‐covered stents changes hepatic encephalopathy compared with bare stents (very low certainty).

2 findings from 1 review

ePTFE‐covered stents vs bare stents

Upper gastrointestinal bleeding · transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt in people with liver cirrhosis

ePTFE‐covered stents may leads to lower upper gastrointestinal bleeding compared with bare stents (low certainty).

2 findings from 1 review

ePTFE‐covered stents vs bare stents

Recurrence of ascites · transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt in people with liver cirrhosis

ePTFE‐covered stents may leads to lower recurrence of ascites compared with bare stents (low certainty).

2 findings from 1 review

ePTFE‐covered stents vs bare stents

Total mortalitya · transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt in people with liver cirrhosis

It is very uncertain whether ePTFE‐covered stents changes all‐cause mortalitya compared with bare stents (very low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

ePTFE‐covered stents vs bare stents

Procedure‐related complications · transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt in people with liver cirrhosis

It is very uncertain whether ePTFE‐covered stents changes procedure‐related complications compared with bare stents (very low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review