What do systematic reviews say?

Social support vs no intervention

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

• Community‐level interventions for improving access to food in low‐ and middle‐income countries 2020 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  no estimate extracted
  Studies not reported
  No studies found

Social support vs no intervention

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

• Community‐level interventions for improving access to food in low‐ and middle‐income countries 2020 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  no estimate extracted
  Studies not reported
  No studies found

Social support vs no intervention

• Community‐level interventions for improving access to food in low‐ and middle‐income countries 2020 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  no estimate extracted
  1687 participants
  Very low

Social support vs no intervention

• Community‐level interventions for improving access to food in low‐ and middle‐income countries 2020 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  no estimate extracted
  1615 participants
  Very low

Social support vs no intervention

• Community‐level interventions for improving access to food in low‐ and middle‐income countries 2020 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  no estimate extracted
  1 study · 1481 participants
  Low

Social support vs no intervention

• Community‐level interventions for improving access to food in low‐ and middle‐income countries 2020 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  no estimate extracted
  1 study · 1481 participants
  Moderate

Social support vs no intervention

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

• Community‐level interventions for improving access to food in low‐ and middle‐income countries 2020 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  no estimate extracted
  Studies not reported
  No studies found

Multiple methods of breastfeeding support (including social, educational and/or physical support) vs usual care

It is very uncertain whether multiple methods of breastfeeding support (including social,… changes any breastfeeding at 6 months compared with usual care (very low certainty).

• Interventions for supporting the initiation and continuation of breastfeeding among women who are overweight or obese 2019 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  RR 1.42 [1.08, 1.87]
  2 studies · 223 participants
  Very low
• Interventions for supporting the initiation and continuation of breastfeeding among women who are overweight or obese 2019 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  RR 1.04 [0.57, 1.89]
  2 studies · 103 participants
  Very low

Multiple methods of breastfeeding support (including social, educational and/or physical support) vs usual care

It is very uncertain whether multiple methods of breastfeeding support (including social,… changes non‐initiation of breastfeeding compared with usual care (very low certainty).

• Interventions for supporting the initiation and continuation of breastfeeding among women who are overweight or obese 2019 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  RR 1.03 [0.07, 16.11]
  3 studies · 380 participants
  Very low

Multiple methods of breastfeeding support (including social, educational and/or physical support) vs usual care

It is very uncertain whether multiple methods of breastfeeding support (including social,… changes exclusive breastfeeding at 4‐6 weeks compared with usual care (very low certainty).

• Interventions for supporting the initiation and continuation of breastfeeding among women who are overweight or obese 2019 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  RR 1.21 [0.83, 1.77]
  4 studies · 445 participants
  Very low

Multiple methods of breastfeeding support (including social, educational and/or physical support) vs usual care

It is very uncertain whether multiple methods of breastfeeding support (including social,… changes exclusive breastfeeding at 6 months compared with usual care (very low certainty).

• Interventions for supporting the initiation and continuation of breastfeeding among women who are overweight or obese 2019 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  RR 7.23 [0.38, 137.08]
  1 study · 120 participants
  Very low