Findings

What do systematic reviews say?

2 questions · 2 findings · 1 reviews

Sort:Best matchNewest Highest certainty Download CSV

No studies found 0 · 0%GRADE not reported 0 · 0%Very low 1 · 50%Low 1 · 50%Moderate 0 · 0%High 0 · 0%

Single‐incision slings vs retropubic minimally‐invasive slings

Number of women requiring repeat continence surgery or mesh revision · women with urinary incontinence

It is very uncertain whether single‐incision slings changes number of women requiring repeat continence surgery or mesh revision compared with retropubic minimally‐invasive slings (very low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Single‐incision sling operations for urinary incontinence in women 2023 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
RR 4.19 [0.31, 57.28]
2 studies · 182 participants
Very low

Single‐incision slings vs transobturator minimally‐invasive slings

Number of women requiring repeat continence surgery or mesh revision · women with urinary incontinence

Single‐incision slings showed no clear difference in number of women requiring repeat continence surgery or mesh revision compared with transobturator minimally‐invasive slings (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Single‐incision sling operations for urinary incontinence in women 2023 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
RR 1.42 [0.94, 2.16]
13 studies · 1460 participants
Low