Findings

What do systematic reviews say?

3 questions · 3 findings · 1 reviews

Sort:Best matchNewest Highest certainty Download CSV

No studies found 1 · 33.3%GRADE not reported 0 · 0%Very low 0 · 0%Low 1 · 33.3%Moderate 1 · 33.3%High 0 · 0%

Single‐incision slings vs retropubic minimally‐invasive slings

Number of women with urinary retention · women with urinary incontinence

Single‐incision slings showed no clear difference in number of women with urinary retention compared with retropubic minimally‐invasive slings (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Single‐incision sling operations for urinary incontinence in women 2023 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
RR 0.47 [0.12, 1.84]
2 studies · 209 participants
Low

Single‐incision slings vs transobturator minimally‐invasive slings

Number of women with urinary retention · women with urinary incontinence

Single‐incision slings probably leads to lower number of women with urinary retention compared with transobturator minimally‐invasive slings (moderate certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Single‐incision sling operations for urinary incontinence in women 2023 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
RR 0.68 [0.47, 0.97]
23 studies · 2891 participants
Moderate

Single‐incision slings vs autologous fascial slings

Number of women with urinary retention · women with urinary incontinence

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review

Single‐incision sling operations for urinary incontinence in women 2023 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found