What do systematic reviews say?

Saphenous vein cutdown vs intraosseous route

Saphenous vein cutdown showed no clear difference in insertion failures compared with intraosseous route (low certainty).

• Comparison of routes for achieving parenteral access with a focus on the management of patients with Ebola virus disease 2015 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  RR 4 [0.51, 31.13]
  1 study · 13 participants
  Low

Saphenous vein cutdown vs intraosseous route

• Comparison of routes for achieving parenteral access with a focus on the management of patients with Ebola virus disease 2015 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  no estimate extracted
  1 study · 13 participants
  Moderate

Saphenous vein cutdown vs intraosseous route

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

• Comparison of routes for achieving parenteral access with a focus on the management of patients with Ebola virus disease 2015 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  no estimate extracted
  Studies not reported
  No studies found

Saphenous vein cutdown vs intraosseous route

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

• Comparison of routes for achieving parenteral access with a focus on the management of patients with Ebola virus disease 2015 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  no estimate extracted
  Studies not reported
  No studies found

Saphenous vein cutdown vs intraosseous route

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

• Comparison of routes for achieving parenteral access with a focus on the management of patients with Ebola virus disease 2015 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  no estimate extracted
  Studies not reported
  No studies found