What do systematic reviews say?

Sacral colpopexy: laparoscopic vs alternative approach

Sacral colpopexy: laparoscopic showed no clear difference in surgery for recurrent prolapse compared with alternative approach (moderate certainty).

• Surgery for women with apical vaginal prolapse 2023 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  RR 0.77 [0.26, 2.31]
  3 studies · 208 participants
  Moderate

Sacral colpopexy: laparoscopic vs alternative approach

Sacral colpopexy: laparoscopic showed no clear difference in awareness of prolapse: Laparoscopic versus open compared with alternative approach (low certainty).

• Surgery for women with apical vaginal prolapse 2023 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  RR 2.06 [0.4, 10.54]
  2 studies · 193 participants
  Low

Sacral colpopexy: laparoscopic vs alternative approach

Sacral colpopexy: laparoscopic showed no clear difference in prolapse on examination (Stage 2 or more): Any recurrent prolapse compared with alternative approach (low certainty).

• Surgery for women with apical vaginal prolapse 2023 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  RR 1.29 [0.64, 2.56]
  3 studies · 225 participants
  Low

Sacral colpopexy: laparoscopic vs alternative approach

It is very uncertain whether sacral colpopexy: laparoscopic changes any complications (Clavien‐Dindo > 3) compared with alternative approach (very low certainty).

• Surgery for women with apical vaginal prolapse 2023 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  RR 1.26 [0.17, 9.44]
  2 studies · 193 participants
  Very low

Sacral colpopexy: laparoscopic vs alternative approach

• Surgery for women with apical vaginal prolapse 2023 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  no estimate extracted
  3 studies · 241 participants
  Very low

Sacral colpopexy: laparoscopic vs alternative approach

• Surgery for women with apical vaginal prolapse 2023 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  no estimate extracted
  3 studies · 246 participants
  Low