What do systematic reviews say?

Postoperative feeding via nasojejunal tube vs postoperative parenteral nutrition (PN)

• Nutritional interventions for liver‐transplanted patients 2012 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  no estimate extracted
  1 study · 24 participants
  Very low

Postoperative feeding via nasojejunal tube vs postoperative parenteral nutrition (PN)

• Nutritional interventions for liver‐transplanted patients 2012 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  no estimate extracted
  1 study · 24 participants
  Very low

Postoperative feeding via nasojejunal tube vs postoperative parenteral nutrition (PN)

It is very uncertain whether postoperative enteral nutrition (Osmolite) via nasojejunal tube changes mortality compared with postoperative parenteral nutrition (PN) (very low certainty).

• Nutritional interventions for liver‐transplanted patients 2012 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  OR 0.7 [0.01, 60.29]
  1 study · 24 participants
  Very low

Postoperative feeding via nasojejunal tube vs postoperative parenteral nutrition (PN)

It is very uncertain whether postoperative enteral nutrition (Osmolite) via nasojejunal tube changes side effects (vomiting, diarrhoea) compared with postoperative parenteral nutrition (PN) (very low certainty).

• Nutritional interventions for liver‐transplanted patients 2012 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  OR 0.68 [0.04, 11.17]
  1 study · 24 participants
  Very low

Postoperative feeding via nasojejunal tube vs postoperative parenteral nutrition (PN)

It is very uncertain whether postoperative enteral nutrition (Osmolite) via nasojejunal tube changes infection (overall) compared with postoperative parenteral nutrition (PN) (very low certainty).

• Nutritional interventions for liver‐transplanted patients 2012 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  OR 1.07 [0.12, 8.75]
  1 study · 24 participants
  Very low