evidencegaps
Findings

What do systematic reviews say?

Refine by population, intervention, comparison or outcome
More filters
Evidence found and GRADE certainty

8 questions · 8 findings · 1 reviews · Headline outcomes only

Sort:Best matchNewestHighest certaintyDownload CSV
No studies found 5 · 62.5%GRADE not reported 0 · 0%Very low 3 · 37.5%Low 0 · 0%Moderate 0 · 0%High 0 · 0%

Pharmacomechanical thrombolysis (Cragg® catheter) vs pulse spray technique

Technical success · thrombosed haemodialysis arteriovenous fistulas and grafts

It is very uncertain whether pharmacomechanical thrombolysis (Cragg® catheter) changes technical success compared with pulse spray technique (very low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Pharmacomechanical thrombolysis (Cragg® catheter) vs pulse spray technique

Minor adverse events · thrombosed haemodialysis arteriovenous fistulas and grafts

It is very uncertain whether pharmacomechanical thrombolysis (Cragg® catheter) changes minor adverse events compared with pulse spray technique (very low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Pharmacomechanical thrombolysis (Cragg® catheter) vs pulse spray technique

Major adverse events · thrombosed haemodialysis arteriovenous fistulas and grafts

It is very uncertain whether pharmacomechanical thrombolysis (Cragg® catheter) changes major adverse events compared with pulse spray technique (very low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review