Findings

What do systematic reviews say?

3 questions · 3 findings · 1 reviews · Other oral health

Sort:Best matchNewest Highest certainty Download CSV

No studies found 1 · 33.3%GRADE not reported 1 · 33.3%Very low 1 · 33.3%Low 0 · 0%Moderate 0 · 0%High 0 · 0%

Pedicled buccal fat pad flap (PBFPF) vs Buccal flap (BF)

Time to complete healing · People of any age with oro-antral communications, fistulae, or both caused by dental procedures

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review

Interventions for treating oro‐antral communications and fistulae due to dental procedures 2018 · Cochrane All outcomes
no estimate extracted
0 studies
No studies found

Pedicled buccal fat pad flap (PBFPF) vs Buccal flap (BF)

Adverse effects of treatment failure (such as graft necrosis and rejection or chronic sinusitis) · People of any age with oro-antral communications, fistulae, or both caused by dental procedures

1 finding from 1 review

Interventions for treating oro‐antral communications and fistulae due to dental procedures 2018 · Cochrane All outcomes
None reported as there were no treatment failures.
1 study · 20 participants
GRADE not reported

Pedicled buccal fat pad flap (PBFPF) vs Buccal flap (BF)

Successful (complete) closure of oro-antral communication · People of any age with oro-antral communications, fistulae, or both caused by dental procedures

It is very uncertain whether pedicled buccal fat pad flap (PBFPF) changes successful (complete) closure of oro-antral communication compared with buccal flap (BF) (very low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Interventions for treating oro‐antral communications and fistulae due to dental procedures 2018 · Cochrane All outcomes
One month after surgery
RR 1.00 [0.83, 1.20]
1 study · 20 participants
Very low