What do systematic reviews say?

Intravenous iron with oral iron vs oral iron

• Treatment for women with postpartum iron deficiency anaemia 2015 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  no estimate extracted
  0 studies · 1 participants
  Low

Subcutaneous EPO with oral iron vs oral iron

• Treatment for women with postpartum iron deficiency anaemia 2015 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  no estimate extracted
  0 studies · 40 participants
  GRADE not reported

Subcutaneous EPO with oral iron vs oral iron

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

• Treatment for women with postpartum iron deficiency anaemia 2015 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  no estimate extracted
  Studies not reported
  No studies found

Subcutaneous EPO with oral iron vs oral iron

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

• Treatment for women with postpartum iron deficiency anaemia 2015 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  no estimate extracted
  Studies not reported
  No studies found

Subcutaneous EPO with oral iron vs oral iron

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

• Treatment for women with postpartum iron deficiency anaemia 2015 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  no estimate extracted
  Studies not reported
  No studies found

Intraoral distalising appliance vs Another (different) intraoral distalising appliance

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

• Orthodontic treatment for distalising upper first molars in children and adolescents 2013 · Cochrane All outcomes
  Number of attendances required to complete treatment was not reported by these studies.
  0 studies
  No studies found

Intraoral distalising appliance vs Headgear (extraoral appliance)

It is very uncertain whether intraoral distalising appliance changes movement of upper first molars (mm) compared with headgear (extraoral appliance) (very low certainty).

• Orthodontic treatment for distalising upper first molars in children and adolescents 2013 · Cochrane All outcomes
  MD -1.45 [-2.74, -0.15]
  4 studies · 150 participants
  Very low

Intraoral distalising appliance vs Headgear (extraoral appliance)

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

• Orthodontic treatment for distalising upper first molars in children and adolescents 2013 · Cochrane All outcomes
  Non-compliance rate not reported ("The remaining secondary outcomes and adverse effects were not reported by these studies").
  0 studies
  No studies found

Intraoral distalising appliance vs Headgear (extraoral appliance)

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

• Orthodontic treatment for distalising upper first molars in children and adolescents 2013 · Cochrane All outcomes
  Adverse effects were not reported by these studies.
  0 studies
  No studies found

Intraoral distalising appliance vs Another (different) intraoral distalising appliance

• Orthodontic treatment for distalising upper first molars in children and adolescents 2013 · Cochrane All outcomes
  Duration of treatment reported by 2 studies (Altug-Atac 2008, Karacay 2006); not GRADE-rated and not in a SoF table. 3D bimetric distalising arch 3.4 months vs modified Begg intraoral distalising system 6.5 months (MD…
  2 studies
  GRADE not reported

Intraoral distalising appliance vs Headgear (extraoral appliance)

• Orthodontic treatment for distalising upper first molars in children and adolescents 2013 · Cochrane All outcomes
  Duration of treatment (to end of molar distalisation) reported by 3 studies (120 participants); not GRADE-rated and not in a SoF table. Bondemark 2005: intraoral appliance with superelastic coils 5.2 months (SD 1) vs…
  3 studies · 120 participants
  GRADE not reported

Intraoral distalising appliance vs Another (different) intraoral distalising appliance

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

• Orthodontic treatment for distalising upper first molars in children and adolescents 2013 · Cochrane All outcomes
  Adverse effects were not reported by these studies.
  0 studies
  No studies found

Intraoral distalising appliance vs Another (different) intraoral distalising appliance

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

• Orthodontic treatment for distalising upper first molars in children and adolescents 2013 · Cochrane All outcomes
  Non-compliance rate not reported ("The remaining secondary outcomes and adverse effects were not reported by these studies").
  0 studies
  No studies found

Intraoral distalising appliance vs Headgear (extraoral appliance)

Intraoral distalising appliance may leads to higher movement of upper incisor teeth (mm) compared with headgear (extraoral appliance) (low certainty).

• Orthodontic treatment for distalising upper first molars in children and adolescents 2013 · Cochrane All outcomes
  MD 1.82 [1.39, 2.24]
  4 studies · 150 participants
  Low

Intraoral distalising appliance vs Another (different) intraoral distalising appliance

• Orthodontic treatment for distalising upper first molars in children and adolescents 2013 · Cochrane All outcomes
  SoF table 3 (intraoral vs other intraoral appliance). Assumed risk "Not estimated"; Corresponding risk "Not estimated"; Relative effect "Meta-analysis not appropriate". Quality: very low. Comment: "No pooled estimate…
  3 studies · 93 participants
  Very low

Intraoral distalising appliance vs Headgear (extraoral appliance)

Intraoral distalising appliance may leads to higher change in overjet (mm) compared with headgear (extraoral appliance) (low certainty).

• Orthodontic treatment for distalising upper first molars in children and adolescents 2013 · Cochrane All outcomes
  MD 1.64 [1.26, 2.02]
  2 studies · 70 participants
  Low

Intraoral distalising appliance vs Headgear (extraoral appliance)

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

• Orthodontic treatment for distalising upper first molars in children and adolescents 2013 · Cochrane All outcomes
  Number of attendances required to complete treatment was not reported by these studies.
  0 studies
  No studies found

Intraoral distalising appliance vs Another (different) intraoral distalising appliance

• Orthodontic treatment for distalising upper first molars in children and adolescents 2013 · Cochrane All outcomes
  SoF table 3. Assumed risk "Not estimated"; Corresponding risk "Not estimated"; Relative effect "Meta-analysis not appropriate". Quality: very low. Comment: "No pooled estimate due to different types of appliances used…
  2 studies · 70 participants
  Very low

Intraoral distalising appliance vs Another (different) intraoral distalising appliance

• Orthodontic treatment for distalising upper first molars in children and adolescents 2013 · Cochrane All outcomes
  SoF table 3. Assumed risk "Not estimated"; Corresponding risk "Not estimated"; Relative effect "Meta-analysis not appropriate". Quality: very low. Comment: "No pooled estimate due to different types of appliances used…
  2 studies · 70 participants
  Very low

Biotene OralBalance vs control

• Oral hygiene care for critically ill patients to prevent ventilator‐associated pneumonia 2020 · Cochrane All outcomes
  Biotene OralBalance versus control (Stefanescu 2013, 41 participants): no difference in incidence of VAP; single study, high risk of bias.
  1 study · 41 participants
  GRADE not reported