What do systematic reviews say?

7 questions · 7 findings · 1 reviews · Pregnancy and Childbirth

Sort:Best matchNewest Highest certainty Download CSV

No studies found 2 · 28.6%GRADE not reported 0 · 0%Very low 0 · 0%Low 4 · 57.1%Moderate 1 · 14.3%High 0 · 0%

Closest answers

The findings closest to your search, judged one by one by TypeSafe's Jev model.

Direct match · question page
- One frequency of amniotic membranes sweeping vs another frequency of amniotic membrane sweeping · Spontaneous vaginal birth
  Membrane sweeping for induction of labour 2020 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  RR 1 [0.86, 1.17]
  1 study · 234 participants
  Moderate
Direct match · question page
- One frequency of amniotic membranes sweeping vs another frequency of amniotic membrane sweeping · Caesarean section
  Membrane sweeping for induction of labour 2020 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  RR 0.93 [0.6, 1.46]
  1 study · 234 participants
  Low
Direct match · question page
- One frequency of amniotic membranes sweeping vs another frequency of amniotic membrane sweeping · Induction of labour
  Membrane sweeping for induction of labour 2020 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  RR 1.19 [0.76, 1.85]
  1 study · 234 participants
  Low
Direct match · question page
- One frequency of amniotic membranes sweeping vs another frequency of amniotic membrane sweeping · Maternal death or serious maternal morbidity
  Membrane sweeping for induction of labour 2020 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  RR 0.78 [0.3, 2.02]
  1 study · 234 participants
  Low
Direct match · question page
- One frequency of amniotic membranes sweeping vs another frequency of amniotic membrane sweeping · Neonatal death or serious neonatal perinatal morbidity
  Membrane sweeping for induction of labour 2020 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  RR 2 [0.18, 21.76]
  1 study · 234 participants
  Low

One frequency of amniotic membranes sweeping vs another frequency of amniotic membrane sweeping

Spontaneous onset of labour ‐ not reported · pregnant women carrying a live fetus at or near term (≥ 36 weeks' gestation).

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review

Membrane sweeping for induction of labour 2020 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found

One frequency of amniotic membranes sweeping vs another frequency of amniotic membrane sweeping

Induction of labour · pregnant women carrying a live fetus at or near term (≥ 36 weeks' gestation).

One frequency of amniotic membranes sweeping showed no clear difference in induction of labour compared with another frequency of amniotic membrane sweeping (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Membrane sweeping for induction of labour 2020 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
RR 1.19 [0.76, 1.85]
1 study · 234 participants
Low

One frequency of amniotic membranes sweeping vs another frequency of amniotic membrane sweeping

Caesarean section · pregnant women carrying a live fetus at or near term (≥ 36 weeks' gestation).

One frequency of amniotic membranes sweeping showed no clear difference in caesarean section compared with another frequency of amniotic membrane sweeping (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Membrane sweeping for induction of labour 2020 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
RR 0.93 [0.6, 1.46]
1 study · 234 participants
Low

One frequency of amniotic membranes sweeping vs another frequency of amniotic membrane sweeping

Spontaneous vaginal birth · pregnant women carrying a live fetus at or near term (≥ 36 weeks' gestation).

One frequency of amniotic membranes sweeping showed no clear difference in spontaneous vaginal birth compared with another frequency of amniotic membrane sweeping (moderate certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Membrane sweeping for induction of labour 2020 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
RR 1 [0.86, 1.17]
1 study · 234 participants
Moderate

One frequency of amniotic membranes sweeping vs another frequency of amniotic membrane sweeping

Uterine hyperstimulation with/without fetal heart rate (FHR) changes ‐ not reported · pregnant women carrying a live fetus at or near term (≥ 36 weeks' gestation).

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review

Membrane sweeping for induction of labour 2020 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found

One frequency of amniotic membranes sweeping vs another frequency of amniotic membrane sweeping

Serious maternal morbidity or death · pregnant women carrying a live fetus at or near term (≥ 36 weeks' gestation).

One frequency of amniotic membranes sweeping showed no clear difference in maternal death or serious maternal morbidity compared with another frequency of amniotic membrane sweeping (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Membrane sweeping for induction of labour 2020 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
RR 0.78 [0.3, 2.02]
1 study · 234 participants
Low

One frequency of amniotic membranes sweeping vs another frequency of amniotic membrane sweeping

Neonatal death or serious neonatal perinatal morbidity · pregnant women carrying a live fetus at or near term (≥ 36 weeks' gestation).

One frequency of amniotic membranes sweeping showed no clear difference in neonatal death or serious neonatal perinatal morbidity compared with another frequency of amniotic membrane sweeping (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Membrane sweeping for induction of labour 2020 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
RR 2 [0.18, 21.76]
1 study · 234 participants
Low