Findings

What do systematic reviews say?

5 questions · 5 findings · 1 reviews

No studies found 3 · 60%GRADE not reported 0 · 0%Very low 1 · 20%Low 1 · 20%Moderate 0 · 0%High 0 · 0%

Multiple pregnancy rate · subfertile women

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review

Cycle regimens for frozen‐thawed embryo transfer 2017 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found

Multiple pregnancy rate · subfertile women

It is very uncertain whether natural cycle FET changes multiple pregnancy rate per woman compared with HT FET (very low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Cycle regimens for frozen‐thawed embryo transfer 2017 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
OR 2.48 [0.09, 68.14]
1 study · 21 participants
Very low

Multiple pregnancy rate · subfertile women

Natural cycle FET showed no clear difference in multiple pregnancy rate per woman compared with HT plus GnRHa suppression FET (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Cycle regimens for frozen‐thawed embryo transfer 2017 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
OR 0.58 [0.13, 2.5]
1 study · 159 participants
Low

Multiple pregnancy rate · subfertile women

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review

Cycle regimens for frozen‐thawed embryo transfer 2017 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found

Multiple pregnancy rate · subfertile women

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review

Cycle regimens for frozen‐thawed embryo transfer 2017 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found