Findings

What do systematic reviews say?

43 questions · 47 findings · 5 reviews

Sort:Best matchNewest Highest certainty Download CSV

No studies found 16 · 34%GRADE not reported 0 · 0%Very low 10 · 21.3%Low 16 · 34%Moderate 5 · 10.6%High 0 · 0%

Modified natural cycle FET (HCG trigger) vs HT + GnRHa FET

Miscarriage · subfertile women

Modified natural cycle FET (HCG trigger) showed no clear difference in miscarriage rate per woman compared with HT + GnRHa suppression FET (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Cycle regimens for frozen‐thawed embryo transfer 2017 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
OR 0.74 [0.25, 2.19]
1 study · 236 participants
Low

Modified natural cycle FET (HCG trigger) vs HT + GnRHa FET

Ongoing pregnancy · subfertile women

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review

Cycle regimens for frozen‐thawed embryo transfer 2017 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found

Modified natural cycle FET (HCG trigger) vs HT + GnRHa FET

Multiple pregnancy rate · subfertile women

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review

Cycle regimens for frozen‐thawed embryo transfer 2017 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found