Mortality Mortality at latest · heart transplant recipients
Monoclonal antibody showed no clear difference in mortality Mortality at latest compared with polyclonal antibody (low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Acute rejection Acute rejection grade 3A or more verified by biopsy · heart transplant recipients
Monoclonal antibody showed no clear difference in acute rejection Acute rejection grade 3A or more verified by biopsy compared with polyclonal antibody (low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Infection Number of participants diagnosed with infection · heart transplant recipients
Monoclonal antibody showed no clear difference in infection Number of participants diagnosed with infection compared with polyclonal antibody (low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
CMV infection · heart transplant recipients
Monoclonal antibody showed no clear difference in cytomegalovirus infection Number of participants diagnosed with CMV… compared with polyclonal antibody (low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Post‐transplantation lymphoproliferative disorder Number of participants diagnosed with PTLD · heart transplant recipients
Monoclonal antibody showed no clear difference in post‐transplantation lymphoproliferative disorder Number of… compared with polyclonal antibody (low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Cancer · heart transplant recipients
Monoclonal antibody showed no clear difference in cancer Number of participants diagnosed with cancer compared with polyclonal antibody (low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Adverse effects · People with squamous cell carcinoma of the oral cavity or oropharynx
10 findings from 1 review
Mucositis all grades: not estimable due to high heterogeneity (P=0.0009; I2=86%) between subgroups (cetuximab; nimotuzumab) and within cetuximab (I2=93%); 1417 participants, 3 studies. Table 3, row 1.6 (Ang 2014;…
3 studies · 1417 participants
GRADE not reported
RR 6.56 [5.35, 8.03]
2 studies · 1311 participants
GRADE not reported
RR 1.36 [0.80, 2.31]
2 studies · 1311 participants
GRADE not reported
Show 7 more findings
Progression‐free survival · People with squamous cell carcinoma of the oral cavity or oropharynx
EGFR monoclonal antibody (cetuximab or nimotuzumab) plus standard… showed no clear difference in progression-free survival compared with standard therapy alone (radiotherapy or chemoradiotherapy); GRADE not reported.
2 findings from 1 review
Participant satisfaction · People with squamous cell carcinoma of the oral cavity or oropharynx
The review found no eligible studies for this question.
1 finding from 1 review
Costs (direct and indirect) · People with squamous cell carcinoma of the oral cavity or oropharynx
The review found no eligible studies for this question.
1 finding from 1 review
Overall survival · People with squamous cell carcinoma of the oral cavity or oropharynx
EGFR monoclonal antibody (cetuximab or nimotuzumab) plus standard… probably leads to lower overall survival compared with standard therapy alone (radiotherapy or chemoradiotherapy) (moderate certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Locoregional control · People with squamous cell carcinoma of the oral cavity or oropharynx
EGFR monoclonal antibody (cetuximab or nimotuzumab) plus standard… probably leads to lower locoregional control compared with standard therapy alone (radiotherapy or chemoradiotherapy) (moderate certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Quality of life · People with squamous cell carcinoma of the oral cavity or oropharynx
1 finding from 1 review
Only one study (Bonner 2006, 424 participants) comprehensively assessed quality of life using EORTC QLQ-C30 (v3.0) and QLQ-H&N35; no statistically significant difference between groups for global health status or any…
1 study · 424 participants
GRADE not reported