Microwave coagulation vs conventional surgery
Health‐related quality of life · people with liver metastases
The review found no eligible studies for this question.
1 finding from 1 review
- no estimate extractedStudies not reportedNo studies found
Findings
What do systematic reviews say?
22 questions · 22 findings · 1 reviews
No studies found 11 · 50%GRADE not reported 2 · 9.1%Very low 9 · 40.9%Low 0 · 0%Moderate 0 · 0%High 0 · 0%
Microwave coagulation vs conventional surgery
Any adverse events or complications · people with liver metastases
1 finding from 1 review
- no estimate extracted1 study · 30 participantsVery low
Microwave coagulation vs conventional surgery
Disease-free survival · people with liver metastases
1 finding from 1 review
- no estimate extracted1 study · 30 participantsVery low
Microwave coagulation vs conventional surgery
Failure to clear liver metastases · people with liver metastases
The review found no eligible studies for this question.
1 finding from 1 review
- no estimate extractedStudies not reportedNo studies found
Microwave coagulation vs conventional surgery
Recurrence of liver metastases · people with liver metastases
The review found no eligible studies for this question.
1 finding from 1 review
- no estimate extractedStudies not reportedNo studies found
Microwave coagulation vs radiofrequency ablation
All‐cause mortality · people with liver metastases
It is very uncertain whether microwave coagulation changes all‐cause mortality compared with radiofrequency ablation (very low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
- RR 0.62 [0.26, 1.47]1 study · 50 participantsVery low
Microwave coagulation vs radiofrequency ablation
Time to mortality (overall survival) · people with liver metastases
It is very uncertain whether microwave coagulation changes time to mortality (overall survival) compared with radiofrequency ablation (very low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
- HR 0.63 [0.23, 1.73]1 study · 50 participantsVery low
Microwave coagulation vs radiofrequency ablation
Health‐related quality of life · people with liver metastases
The review found no eligible studies for this question.
1 finding from 1 review
- no estimate extractedStudies not reportedNo studies found
Microwave coagulation vs radiofrequency ablation
Any adverse events or complications · people with liver metastases
It is very uncertain whether microwave coagulation changes any adverse events or complications compared with radiofrequency ablation (very low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
- RR 0.19 [0.01, 3.67]1 study · 50 participantsVery low
Microwave coagulation vs radiofrequency ablation
Disease-free survival · people with liver metastases
The review found no eligible studies for this question.
1 finding from 1 review
- no estimate extractedStudies not reportedNo studies found
Microwave coagulation vs radiofrequency ablation
Failure to clear liver metastases · people with liver metastases
1 finding from 1 review
- no estimate extracted1 study · 50 participantsGRADE not reported
Microwave coagulation vs radiofrequency ablation
Recurrence of liver metastases local progression · people with liver metastases
It is very uncertain whether microwave coagulation changes recurrence of liver metastases local progression compared with radiofrequency ablation (very low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
- RR 0.19 [0.01, 3.67]1 study · 50 participantsVery low
Microwave coagulation vs radiofrequency ablation
Recurrence of liver metastases distant recurrence · people with liver metastases
It is very uncertain whether microwave coagulation changes recurrence of liver metastases distant recurrence compared with radiofrequency ablation (very low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
- RR 1.03 [0.5, 2.08]1 study · 50 participantsVery low
Microwave coagulation vs conventional surgery
All‐cause mortality · people with liver metastases
1 finding from 1 review
- no estimate extracted1 study · 40 participantsGRADE not reported
Microwave coagulation vs conventional surgery
Time to mortality (overall survival) · people with liver metastases
It is very uncertain whether microwave coagulation changes time to mortality (overall survival) compared with conventional surgery (very low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
- HR 0.91 [0.39, 2.15]1 study · 30 participantsVery low
Microwave coagulation in addition to conventional transarterial chemoembolisation vs chemoembolisation
All‐cause mortality · people with liver metastases
The review found no eligible studies for this question.
1 finding from 1 review
- no estimate extractedStudies not reportedNo studies found
Microwave coagulation in addition to conventional transarterial chemoembolisation vs chemoembolisation
Time to mortality · people with liver metastases
The review found no eligible studies for this question.
1 finding from 1 review
- no estimate extractedStudies not reportedNo studies found
Microwave coagulation in addition to conventional transarterial chemoembolisation vs chemoembolisation
Health‐related quality of life · people with liver metastases
The review found no eligible studies for this question.
1 finding from 1 review
- no estimate extractedStudies not reportedNo studies found
Microwave coagulation in addition to conventional transarterial chemoembolisation vs chemoembolisation
Any adverse events or complications · people with liver metastases
1 finding from 1 review
- no estimate extracted1 study · 50 participantsVery low
Microwave coagulation in addition to conventional transarterial chemoembolisation vs chemoembolisation
Disease-free survival · people with liver metastases
The review found no eligible studies for this question.
1 finding from 1 review
- no estimate extractedStudies not reportedNo studies found