Mesalamine vs placebo
Mesalamine showed no clear difference in clinical response compared with placebo (low certainty).
- RR 0.74 [0.44, 1.24]1 study · 62 participantsLow
Mesalamine showed no clear difference in clinical response compared with placebo (low certainty).
Mesalamine showed no clear difference in histological response compared with placebo (low certainty).
Mesalamine showed no clear difference in adverse events compared with placebo (low certainty).
Mesalamine showed no clear difference in withdrawals due to adverse events compared with placebo (low certainty).
Mesalamine showed no clear difference in serious adverse events compared with placebo (low certainty).
It is very uncertain whether mesalamine changes induction of remission (CDAI < 150) or clinical improvement ‐… compared with sulfasalazine (alone or (very low certainty).
Mesalamine (4 ‐ 4.5 g/day) may leads to lower induction of remission (CDAI < or = 150) ‐ Pentasa (4 g/day) compared with budesonide (low certainty).
Delayed‐release mesalamine (3 ‐ 4.5 g/day) showed no clear difference in induction of remission (CDAI < or =150 with or without decrease of… compared with corticosteroids (moderate certainty).
Controlled‐release mesalamine (1 ‐ 2 g/day) showed no clear difference in decrease in CDAI >=50, HBI >=2 or improvement/remission (as defined… compared with placebo (low certainty).
Controlled‐release mesalamine (1 ‐ 2 g/day) showed no clear difference in induction of remission (CDAI <=150 + decrease of >=50 or as defined… compared with placebo (low certainty).
It is very uncertain whether azo‐bonded and delayed‐release mesalamine (2 ‐ 3.2 g/day) changes induction of remission or clinical improvement ‐ Asacol (3.2 g/day) compared with placebo (very low certainty).
It is very uncertain whether azo‐bonded and delayed‐release mesalamine (2 ‐ 3.2 g/day) changes induction of remission (CDAI < 150 + decrease >=70) ‐ Asacol (3.2… compared with placebo (very low certainty).