Medial epicondylectomy plus oral steroids vs oral steroids alone
Change in sensory score after one year · patients with nerve damage in leprosy
1 finding from 1 review
- no estimate extracted1 study · 57 participantsVery low
Findings
What do systematic reviews say?
6 questions · 6 findings · 1 reviews · Headline outcomes only
No studies found 0 · 0%GRADE not reported 0 · 0%Very low 6 · 100%Low 0 · 0%Moderate 0 · 0%High 0 · 0%
Medial epicondylectomy plus oral steroids vs oral steroids alone
Proportion of ulnar nerves with sensory improvement after one year · patients with nerve damage in leprosy
It is very uncertain whether medial epicondylectomy plus oral steroids changes proportion of ulnar nerves with sensory improvement after one year compared with oral steroids alone (very low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
- RR 1.12 [0.71, 1.77]1 study · 62 participantsVery low
Medial epicondylectomy plus oral steroids vs oral steroids alone
Change in motor score after one year · patients with nerve damage in leprosy
1 finding from 1 review
- no estimate extracted1 study · 57 participantsVery low
Medial epicondylectomy plus oral steroids vs oral steroids alone
Proportion of ulnar nerves with motor improvement after one year · patients with nerve damage in leprosy
It is very uncertain whether medial epicondylectomy plus oral steroids changes proportion of ulnar nerves with motor improvement after one year compared with oral steroids alone (very low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
- RR 0.91 [0.64, 1.28]1 study · 62 participantsVery low
Medial epicondylectomy plus oral steroids vs oral steroids alone
Change in sensory score after two years · patients with nerve damage in leprosy
1 finding from 1 review
- no estimate extracted1 study · 57 participantsVery low
Medial epicondylectomy plus oral steroids vs oral steroids alone
Change in motor score after two years · patients with nerve damage in leprosy
1 finding from 1 review
- no estimate extracted1 study · 57 participantsVery low