Findings

What do systematic reviews say?

7 questions · 7 findings · 1 reviews · Heart

No studies found 1 · 14.3%GRADE not reported 0 · 0%Very low 6 · 85.7%Low 0 · 0%Moderate 0 · 0%High 0 · 0%

30‐day survival · people with acute cardiogenic shock

It is very uncertain whether mechanical assist devices changes 30‐day survival compared with intra‐aortic balloon pump (very low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Mechanical assist devices for acute cardiogenic shock 2020 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
RR 1.01 [0.76, 1.35]
5 studies · 162 participants
Very low

Quality of life · people with acute cardiogenic shock

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review

Mechanical assist devices for acute cardiogenic shock 2020 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found

MACE · people with acute cardiogenic shock

1 finding from 1 review

Mechanical assist devices for acute cardiogenic shock 2020 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
3 studies · 122 participants
Very low

Dialysis‐dependent · people with acute cardiogenic shock

1 finding from 1 review

Mechanical assist devices for acute cardiogenic shock 2020 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
1 study · 48 participants
Very low

Length of hospital stay · people with acute cardiogenic shock

1 finding from 1 review

Mechanical assist devices for acute cardiogenic shock 2020 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
1 study · 48 participants
Very low

Duration of ICU stay · people with acute cardiogenic shock

1 finding from 1 review

Mechanical assist devices for acute cardiogenic shock 2020 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
1 study · 48 participants
Very low

Major adverse events · people with acute cardiogenic shock

1 finding from 1 review

Mechanical assist devices for acute cardiogenic shock 2020 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
3 studies · 122 participants
Very low