Findings

What do systematic reviews say?

Refine by population, intervention, comparison or outcome
More filters
Evidence found and GRADE certainty

10 questions · 14 findings · 1 reviews

No studies found 2 · 14.3%GRADE not reported 0 · 0%Very low 5 · 35.7%Low 7 · 50%Moderate 0 · 0%High 0 · 0%

Marine‐derived n‐3 fatty acids therapy vs No marine‐derived n‐3 fatty acids therapy

Efficacy (functional outcome) · stroke and/or TIA

It is very uncertain whether marine‐derived n‐3 fatty acids therapy changes primary outcome: efficacy (functional outcome) compared with no marine‐derived n‐3 fatty acids therapy (very low certainty).

2 findings from 1 review

Marine‐derived n‐3 fatty acids therapy vs No marine‐derived n‐3 fatty acids therapy

Recurrent events (both ischaemic and haemorrhagic stroke) · stroke and/or TIA

Marine‐derived n‐3 fatty acids therapy showed no clear difference in recurrent events (both ischaemic and haemorrhagic stroke) compared with no marine‐derived n‐3 fatty acids therapy (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Marine‐derived n‐3 fatty acids therapy vs No marine‐derived n‐3 fatty acids therapy

Adverse events · stroke and/or TIA

Marine‐derived n‐3 fatty acids therapy showed no clear difference in adverse events compared with no marine‐derived n‐3 fatty acids therapy (low certainty).

2 findings from 1 review

Marine‐derived n‐3 fatty acids therapy vs No marine‐derived n‐3 fatty acids therapy

Recurrent events: fatal or non‐fatal (same type of stroke, i.e. ischaemic or haemorrhagic) · stroke and/or TIA

It is very uncertain whether marine‐derived n‐3 fatty acids therapy changes recurrent events: fatal or non‐fatal (same type of stroke, i.e.… compared with no marine‐derived n‐3 fatty acids therapy (very low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review