Findings

What do systematic reviews say?

3 questions · 3 findings · 1 reviews · Gynaecology and Fertility

Sort:Best matchNewest Highest certainty Download CSV

No studies found 0 · 0%GRADE not reported 0 · 0%Very low 3 · 100%Low 0 · 0%Moderate 0 · 0%High 0 · 0%

Magnetic‐activated cell sorting (MACS) vs hyaluronic acid‐selected sperm (HA‐ICSI)

Miscarriage · assisted reproduction

It is very uncertain whether magnetic‐activated cell sorting (MACS) changes miscarriage per woman randomly assigned compared with hyaluronic acid‐selected sperm (HA‐ICSI) (very low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Advanced sperm selection techniques for assisted reproduction 2019 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
RR 1.52 [0.1, 23.35]
1 study · 78 participants
Very low

Magnetic‐activated cell sorting (MACS) vs hyaluronic acid‐selected sperm (HA‐ICSI)

Miscarriage per clinical pregnancy · assisted reproduction

It is very uncertain whether magnetic‐activated cell sorting (MACS) changes miscarriage per clinical pregnancy compared with hyaluronic acid‐selected sperm (HA‐ICSI) (very low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Advanced sperm selection techniques for assisted reproduction 2019 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
RR 1.06 [0.07, 15.64]
1 study · 37 participants
Very low

Magnetic‐activated cell sorting (MACS) vs hyaluronic acid‐selected sperm (HA‐ICSI)

Clinical pregnancy · assisted reproduction

It is very uncertain whether magnetic‐activated cell sorting (MACS) changes clinical pregnancy per woman randomly assigned compared with hyaluronic acid‐selected sperm (HA‐ICSI) (very low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Advanced sperm selection techniques for assisted reproduction 2019 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
RR 1.44 [0.91, 2.27]
1 study · 78 participants
Very low