Findings

What do systematic reviews say?

3 questions · 3 findings · 1 reviews

Sort:Best matchNewest Highest certainty Download CSV

No studies found 0 · 0%GRADE not reported 3 · 100%Very low 0 · 0%Low 0 · 0%Moderate 0 · 0%High 0 · 0%

Machine-learning algorithms for dental caries detection vs Different machine-learning algorithms for caries prediction

Premolar caries detection accuracy · Dental images of human beings

The review reported 88% accuracy for premolar caries in Lee et al. (Ungraded).

1 finding from 1 review

Uses of Different Machine Learning Algorithms for Diagnosis of Dental Caries. 2022 All outcomes
Korea · Lee et al., 2018; CNN
Accuracy 88
1 study · 3000 participants
GRADE not reported

Machine-learning algorithms for dental caries detection vs Different machine-learning algorithms for caries prediction

Molar and premolar caries detection accuracy · Dental images of human beings

The review reported 82% accuracy for combined molar and premolar caries in Lee et al. (Ungraded).

1 finding from 1 review

Uses of Different Machine Learning Algorithms for Diagnosis of Dental Caries. 2022 All outcomes
Korea · Lee et al., 2018; CNN
Accuracy 82
1 study · 3000 participants
GRADE not reported

Machine-learning algorithms for dental caries detection vs Different machine-learning algorithms for caries prediction

Caries detection accuracy in unrestored molars and premolars · Dental images of human beings

The review reported 92.37% accuracy for automated caries detection in Duong et al. (Ungraded).

1 finding from 1 review

Uses of Different Machine Learning Algorithms for Diagnosis of Dental Caries. 2022 All outcomes
Taiwan · Duong et al., 2021; support vector machine
Accuracy 92.37
1 study · 620 participants
GRADE not reported