Findings

What do systematic reviews say?

5 questions · 5 findings · 1 reviews

Sort:Best matchNewest Highest certainty Download CSV

No studies found 4 · 80%GRADE not reported 0 · 0%Very low 0 · 0%Low 1 · 20%Moderate 0 · 0%High 0 · 0%

Low intensity ES plus PFMT vs maximal intensity ES plus PFMT

Cure: number of women with self‐reported continence · women with stress urinary incontinence

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review

Electrical stimulation with non‐implanted devices for stress urinary incontinence in women 2017 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found

Low intensity ES plus PFMT vs maximal intensity ES plus PFMT

Improvement: number of women with self‐reported improvement in SUI (cured or improved) · women with stress urinary incontinence

Low intensity ES plus PFMT may leads to lower improvement: number of women with self‐reported improvement in SUI… compared with maximal intensity ES plus PFMT (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Electrical stimulation with non‐implanted devices for stress urinary incontinence in women 2017 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
RR 0.28 [0.09, 0.91]
1 study · 49 participants
Low

Low intensity ES plus PFMT vs maximal intensity ES plus PFMT

Incontinence‐specific quality of life · women with stress urinary incontinence

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review

Electrical stimulation with non‐implanted devices for stress urinary incontinence in women 2017 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found

Low intensity ES plus PFMT vs maximal intensity ES plus PFMT

Adverse effects ‐ not reported · women with stress urinary incontinence

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review

Electrical stimulation with non‐implanted devices for stress urinary incontinence in women 2017 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found

Low intensity ES plus PFMT vs maximal intensity ES plus PFMT

Cost‐effectiveness ‐ not reported · women with stress urinary incontinence

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review

Electrical stimulation with non‐implanted devices for stress urinary incontinence in women 2017 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found