Findings

What do systematic reviews say?

Refine by population, intervention, comparison or outcome
More filters
Evidence found and GRADE certainty

54 questions · 68 findings · 6 reviews

No studies found 24 · 35.3%GRADE not reported 1 · 1.5%Very low 17 · 25%Low 20 · 29.4%Moderate 6 · 8.8%High 0 · 0%

Early removal of the LMA vs late removal of the LMA after general anaesthesia

Coughing (immediate) · patients with general anaesthesia

It is very uncertain whether early removal of the LMA changes coughing (immediate) compared with late removal of the LMA after general anaesthesia (very low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Open surgery by transverse incision of the skin in the distal palmar crease vs open surgery

Resolution of symptoms Not measured · patients with trigger finger

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

3 findings from 1 review

Open surgery by transverse incision of the skin in the distal palmar crease vs open surgery

Pain (short‐term) Not measured · patients with trigger finger

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

3 findings from 1 review

Open surgery by transverse incision of the skin in the distal palmar crease vs open surgery

Physical function · patients with trigger finger
3 findings from 1 review

Open surgery by transverse incision of the skin in the distal palmar crease vs open surgery

Participant global assessment of success Not measured · patients with trigger finger

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

3 findings from 1 review

Open surgery by transverse incision of the skin in the distal palmar crease vs open surgery

Recurrence ‐ not measured · patients with trigger finger

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

3 findings from 1 review

Open surgery by transverse incision of the skin in the distal palmar crease vs open surgery

Adverse events Not measured · patients with trigger finger

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

3 findings from 1 review

Open surgery by transverse incision of the skin in the distal palmar crease vs open surgery

Neurovascular injury Not measured · patients with trigger finger

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

3 findings from 1 review

LMA vs endotracheal tube (ETT)

Tally of participants with one or more serious adverse event(s) during procedure or within 24 hours after procedure · critically ill adults undergoing percutaneous dilatational tracheostomy

It is very uncertain whether laryngeal mask airway (LMA) changes tally of participants with one or more serious adverse event(s)… compared with endotracheal tube (ETT) (very low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

LMA vs endotracheal tube (ETT)

Failure of procedure requiring conversion · critically ill adults undergoing percutaneous dilatational tracheostomy

Laryngeal mask airway (LMA) may leads to higher failure of procedure, requiring conversion to any other procedure compared with endotracheal tube (ETT) (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Surfactant administration via laryngeal mask airway (S‐LMA) vs surfactant administration via endotracheal tube (ETT) with the intent to rapidly extubate (InSurE)

Death or bronchopulmonary dysplasia · preterm infants with or at risk of respiratory distress syndrome

Surfactant administration via laryngeal mask airway (S‐LMA) showed no clear difference in death or bronchopulmonary dysplasia compared with surfactant administration via endotracheal tube (ETT) with the… (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Surfactant administration via laryngeal mask airway (S‐LMA) vs surfactant administration through an endotracheal tube (S‐ETT)

Pulmonary air leak · preterm infants with or at risk of respiratory distress syndrome

It is very uncertain whether surfactant administration via laryngeal mask airway (S‐LMA) changes pulmonary air leak, any (during first hospitalisation) Anytime to… compared with surfactant administration via endotracheal tube (ETT) with… (very low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Surfactant administration via laryngeal mask airway (S‐LMA) vs surfactant administration through an endotracheal tube (S‐ETT)

Bronchopulmonary dysplasia · preterm infants with or at risk of respiratory distress syndrome

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review

Surfactant administration via laryngeal mask airway (S‐LMA) vs surfactant administration through an endotracheal tube (S‐ETT)

Intraventricular haemorrhage, Papile grade 3/4 · preterm infants with or at risk of respiratory distress syndrome

It is very uncertain whether surfactant administration via laryngeal mask airway (S‐LMA) changes intraventricular haemorrhage grade III and IV Anytime to discharge compared with surfactant administration via endotracheal tube (ETT) with… (very low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Surfactant administration via laryngeal mask airway (S‐LMA) vs surfactant administration through an endotracheal tube (S‐ETT)

Mortality before hospital discharge · preterm infants with or at risk of respiratory distress syndrome

It is very uncertain whether surfactant administration via laryngeal mask airway (S‐LMA) changes death (all causes) during the first hospitalisation Anytime to… compared with surfactant administration via endotracheal tube (ETT) with… (very low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Surfactant administration via laryngeal mask airway (S‐LMA) vs surfactant administration through an endotracheal tube (S‐ETT)

Neurosensory disability in survivors · preterm infants with or at risk of respiratory distress syndrome

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review

Surfactant administration via laryngeal mask airway (S‐LMA) vs no surfactant administration

Death or bronchopulmonary dysplasia · preterm infants with or at risk of respiratory distress syndrome

Surfactant administration via laryngeal mask airway (S‐LMA) showed no clear difference in death or bronchopulmonary dysplasia compared with no surfactant administration (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review