Findings

What do systematic reviews say?

Refine by population, intervention, comparison or outcome
More filters
Evidence found and GRADE certainty

450 questions · 474 findings · 58 reviews

No studies found 96 · 20.3%GRADE not reported 49 · 10.3%Very low 102 · 21.5%Low 110 · 23.2%Moderate 77 · 16.2%High 40 · 8.4%

Intravenous midazolam vs diazepam

Allergic or anaphylactoid reaction · adults and children requiring sedation before gastrointestinal endoscopy and bronchoscopy

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review

Summary of findings ‐ Intravenous lorazepam vs intravenous diazepam/intravenous phenytoin combination

Seizure cessation: within 10 minutes · Children with acute tonic‐clonic seizures

Summary of findings ‐ Intravenous lorazepam showed no clear difference in seizure cessation: within 10 minutes compared with intravenous diazepam/intravenous phenytoin combination (moderate certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Summary of findings ‐ Intravenous lorazepam vs intravenous diazepam/intravenous phenytoin combination

Incidence of respiratory depression · Children with acute tonic‐clonic seizures

Summary of findings ‐ Intravenous lorazepam showed no clear difference in incidence of respiratory depression compared with intravenous diazepam/intravenous phenytoin combination (moderate certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Summary of findings ‐ Intravenous lorazepam vs intravenous diazepam/intravenous phenytoin combination

Additional drugs required to stop the seizure · Children with acute tonic‐clonic seizures

Summary of findings ‐ Intravenous lorazepam showed no clear difference in additional drugs required to stop the seizure compared with intravenous diazepam/intravenous phenytoin combination (moderate certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Intravenous midazolam vs intravenous diazepam

Incidence of respiratory depression · Children with acute tonic‐clonic seizures

Summary of findings ‐ Intravenous midazolam showed no clear difference in incidence of respiratory depression compared with intravenous diazepam (moderate certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Intravenous midazolam vs intravenous diazepam

Additional drugs required to stop the seizure: additional dose of the trial drug required · Children with acute tonic‐clonic seizures

Summary of findings ‐ Intravenous midazolam showed no clear difference in additional drugs required to stop the seizure: additional dose of… compared with intravenous diazepam (moderate certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Intravenous midazolam vs intravenous diazepam

Seizure recurrence within 24 hours · Children with acute tonic‐clonic seizures

Summary of findings ‐ Intravenous midazolam showed no clear difference in seizure recurrence within 24 hours compared with intravenous diazepam (moderate certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Intravenous midazolam vs intravenous lorazepam

Additional drugs required to stop the seizure: additional dose of the trial drug required · Children with acute tonic‐clonic seizures

Summary of findings ‐ Intravenous midazolam showed no clear difference in additional drugs required to terminate the seizure: additional dose… compared with intravenous lorazepam (moderate certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Intravenous midazolam vs intravenous lorazepam

Seizure recurrence within 24 hours · Children with acute tonic‐clonic seizures

Summary of findings ‐ Intravenous midazolam showed no clear difference in seizure recurrence within 24 hours compared with intravenous lorazepam (moderate certainty).

1 finding from 1 review