Mortality or morbidity composite · pregnant women
1 finding from 1 review
Neonatal hypoglycaemia · pregnant women
1 finding from 1 review
Adiposity · pregnant women
Dietary advice interventions showed no clear difference in childhood/adulthood adiposity: skinfold thickness at 6 months (mm) compared with standard care (child outcomes) (low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Childhood/adulthood type 2 diabetes mellitus · pregnant women
1 finding from 1 review
Neurosensory disability · pregnant women
1 finding from 1 review
Hypertensive disorders of pregnancy (pregnancy‐induced hypertension) · pregnant women
Dietary advice interventions may leads to lower hypertensive disorders of pregnancy (pregnancy‐induced hypertension) compared with standard care (maternal outcomes) (low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Hypertensive disorders of pregnancy: pre‐eclampsia · pregnant women
Dietary advice interventions showed no clear difference in hypertensive disorders of pregnancy (pre‐eclampsia) compared with standard care (maternal outcomes) (low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Caesarean section · pregnant women
Dietary advice interventions showed no clear difference in caesarean section compared with standard care (maternal outcomes) (low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Perineal trauma (anal sphincter injury) · pregnant women
It is very uncertain whether dietary advice interventions changes perineal trauma (anal sphincter injury) compared with standard care (maternal outcomes) (very low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Gestational weight gain · pregnant women
Dietary advice interventions showed no clear difference in gestational weight gain (kg) compared with standard care (maternal outcomes) (low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Postnatal depression · pregnant women
1 finding from 1 review
Perinatal mortality · pregnant women
1 finding from 1 review
Large‐for‐gestational age · pregnant women
1 finding from 1 review
Mean GI symptom scores (IBDQ‐B) · People undergoing pelvic radiotherapy for urological, gynaecological or colorectal cancer
1 finding from 1 review
Acute and late GI toxicity (grade 2+) · People undergoing pelvic radiotherapy for urological, gynaecological or colorectal cancer
The review found no eligible studies for this question.
1 finding from 1 review
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found
Diarrhoea (grade 2+) · People undergoing pelvic radiotherapy for urological, gynaecological or colorectal cancer
Summary of findings: Diet interventions showed no clear difference in diarrhoea (grade 2+) compared with usual on‐treatment diet (low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
QoL · People undergoing pelvic radiotherapy for urological, gynaecological or colorectal cancer
Summary of findings: Diet interventions showed no clear difference in QOL scores (IBDQ) (higher scores better) compared with usual on‐treatment diet (low certainty).
3 findings from 1 review
MD 4.6
1 study · 50 participants
Low
no estimate extracted
1 study · 119 participants
GRADE not reported
MD 2.4
1 study · 76 participants
Low
Diarrhoea (grade 1+) · People undergoing pelvic radiotherapy for urological, gynaecological or colorectal cancer
Summary of findings: Diet interventions showed no clear difference in diarrhoea (grade 1+) compared with usual on‐treatment diet (low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Mean GI symptom scores (Vaizey scale) (higher scores better) · People undergoing pelvic radiotherapy for urological, gynaecological or colorectal cancer
Summary of findings: Diet interventions showed no clear difference in mean GI symptom scores (Vaizey scale) (higher scores better) compared with usual on‐treatment diet (low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Diarrhoea · People undergoing pelvic radiotherapy for urological, gynaecological or colorectal cancer
The review found no eligible studies for this question.
1 finding from 1 review
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found