Re‐employment Measured as percentage or number of participants who obtained paid employment · Unemployed job seekers
Combined interventions probably leads to higher re‐employment Measured as percentage or number of participants who… compared with no intervention (moderate certainty).
2 findings from 1 review
Proportion of participants returning to work in the short term (up to 6 months) · patients with coronary heart disease
Combined interventions may leads to higher proportion of participants returning to work in the short term (up… compared with usual care (low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Proportion of participants returning to work in the medium term (6 months ‐ 1 year) · patients with coronary heart disease
Combined interventions showed no clear difference in proportion of participants returning to work in the medium term (6… compared with usual care (low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Return to work · patients with coronary heart disease
It is very uncertain whether combined interventions changes proportion of participants at work in the long term (> 1 to < 5 years) compared with usual care (very low certainty).
2 findings from 1 review
Proportion of participants at work in the extended long term (≥ 5 years) · patients with coronary heart disease
It is very uncertain whether combined interventions changes proportion of participants at work in the extended long term (≥ 5… compared with usual care (very low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Health‐related quality of life · patients with coronary heart disease
1 finding from 1 review
Adverse effects: reinfarctions · patients with coronary heart disease
Combined interventions showed no clear difference in adverse effects: reinfarctions compared with usual care (moderate certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Aerobic exercise tolerance (all cancers: 8 to 12 weeks of
3 findings from 1 review
no estimate extracted
10 studies · 604 participants
Low
no estimate extracted
4 studies · 201 participants
Low
no estimate extracted
4 studies · 357 participants
Very low
Aerobic exercise tolerance (all cancers: 6 months)
1 finding from 1 review
Aerobic exercise tolerance (breast cancer: 8‐12 weeks of
1 finding from 1 review
Aerobic exercise tolerance (all cancers: home‐based exercise: 8 to 12 weeks of
1 finding from 1 review
Aerobic exercise tolerance (all cancers:supervised exercise: 8 to 12 weeks of
1 finding from 1 review
Elemental diet · People undergoing pelvic radiotherapy for urological, gynaecological or colorectal cancer
The review found no eligible studies for this question.
1 finding from 1 review
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found
Mean GI symptom scores (IBDQ‐B) · People undergoing pelvic radiotherapy for urological, gynaecological or colorectal cancer
1 finding from 1 review
Acute and late GI toxicity (grade 2+) · People undergoing pelvic radiotherapy for urological, gynaecological or colorectal cancer
The review found no eligible studies for this question.
1 finding from 1 review
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found
Diarrhoea (grade 2+) · People undergoing pelvic radiotherapy for urological, gynaecological or colorectal cancer
Summary of findings: Diet interventions showed no clear difference in diarrhoea (grade 2+) compared with usual on‐treatment diet (low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
QoL · People undergoing pelvic radiotherapy for urological, gynaecological or colorectal cancer
Summary of findings: Diet interventions showed no clear difference in QOL scores (IBDQ) (higher scores better) compared with usual on‐treatment diet (low certainty).
3 findings from 1 review
MD 4.6
1 study · 50 participants
Low
no estimate extracted
1 study · 119 participants
GRADE not reported
MD 2.4
1 study · 76 participants
Low
Lactose‐restricted diet · People undergoing pelvic radiotherapy for urological, gynaecological or colorectal cancer
The review found no eligible studies for this question.
1 finding from 1 review
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found
Diarrhoea (grade 1+) · People undergoing pelvic radiotherapy for urological, gynaecological or colorectal cancer
Summary of findings: Diet interventions showed no clear difference in diarrhoea (grade 1+) compared with usual on‐treatment diet (low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
High‐fibre diet · People undergoing pelvic radiotherapy for urological, gynaecological or colorectal cancer
The review found no eligible studies for this question.
1 finding from 1 review
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found