Findings

What do systematic reviews say?

2 questions · 3 findings · 2 reviews

Sort:Best matchNewest Highest certainty Download CSV

No studies found 0 · 0%GRADE not reported 0 · 0%Very low 0 · 0%Low 0 · 0%Moderate 3 · 100%High 0 · 0%

Intensive glycaemic control vs conventional glucose control

All‐cause mortality · patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus

Intensive glycaemic control showed no clear difference in mortality compared with standard glycaemic control (moderate certainty).

2 findings from 2 reviews · compare the 2 reviews

Effect of the treatment of Type 2 diabetes mellitus on the development of cognitive impairment and dementia 2017 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
RR 1 [0.79, 1.26]
3 studies · 15888 participants
Moderate
Targeting intensive glycaemic control versus targeting conventional glycaemic control for type 2 diabetes mellitus 2013 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
RR 1 [0.92, 1.08]
24 studies · 34325 participants
Moderate

Intensive glycaemic control vs conventional glucose control

Cardiovascular mortality · patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus

Intensive glycaemic control showed no clear difference in cardiovascular mortality compared with conventional glycaemic control (moderate certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Targeting intensive glycaemic control versus targeting conventional glycaemic control for type 2 diabetes mellitus 2013 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
RR 1.06 [0.94, 1.21]
22 studies · 34177 participants
Moderate