Findings

What do systematic reviews say?

48 questions · 50 findings · 4 reviews

Sort:Best matchNewest Highest certainty Download CSV

No studies found 23 · 46%GRADE not reported 6 · 12%Very low 15 · 30%Low 5 · 10%Moderate 1 · 2%High 0 · 0%

Summary of findings 2. Octenidine‐dihydrochloride (OCT) hydrogel dressings vs OCT‐free placebo hydrogel dressings

Adverse events · adults with skin graft donor sites

It is very uncertain whether summary of findings 2. Octenidine‐dihydrochloride (OCT) hydrogel… changes adverse events compared with OCT‐free placebo hydrogel dressings (very low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Hydrogel dressings for donor sites of split‐thickness skin grafts 2023 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
RR 0.58 [0.06, 5.89]
1 study · 41 participants
Very low

Summary of findings 1. Amorphous hydrogel dressings vs other types of dressings

Time to complete healing · children with skin graft donor sites

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review

Hydrogel dressings for donor sites of split‐thickness skin grafts 2023 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found

Summary of findings 1. Amorphous hydrogel dressings vs other types of dressings

Donor site pain · children with skin graft donor sites

1 finding from 1 review

Hydrogel dressings for donor sites of split‐thickness skin grafts 2023 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
1 study · 91 participants
Very low

Summary of findings 1. Amorphous hydrogel dressings vs other types of dressings

Health‐related quality of life · children with skin graft donor sites

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review

Hydrogel dressings for donor sites of split‐thickness skin grafts 2023 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found

Summary of findings 1. Amorphous hydrogel dressings vs other types of dressings

Wound infection · children with skin graft donor sites

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review

Hydrogel dressings for donor sites of split‐thickness skin grafts 2023 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found

Summary of findings 1. Amorphous hydrogel dressings vs other types of dressings

Wound complications: scarring · children with skin graft donor sites

2 findings from 1 review

Hydrogel dressings for donor sites of split‐thickness skin grafts 2023 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
1 study · 57 participants
Very low
Hydrogel dressings for donor sites of split‐thickness skin grafts 2023 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
1 study · 66 participants
Very low

Summary of findings 1. Amorphous hydrogel dressings vs other types of dressings

Wound complications: itching · children with skin graft donor sites

2 findings from 1 review

Hydrogel dressings for donor sites of split‐thickness skin grafts 2023 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
1 study · 91 participants
Very low
Hydrogel dressings for donor sites of split‐thickness skin grafts 2023 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
1 study · 1 participants
Very low

Summary of findings 1. Amorphous hydrogel dressings vs other types of dressings

Adverse events · children with skin graft donor sites

1 finding from 1 review

Hydrogel dressings for donor sites of split‐thickness skin grafts 2023 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
1 study · 101 participants
Very low