Findings

What do systematic reviews say?

2 questions · 6 findings · 1 reviews

No studies found 0 · 0%GRADE not reported 6 · 100%Very low 0 · 0%Low 0 · 0%Moderate 0 · 0%High 0 · 0%

Restoration survival · Permanent posterior teeth with multiple-surface cavities

The pooled survival rate was 41% at 2 years.

3 findings from 1 review

Survival of atraumatic restorative treatment (ART) sealants and restorations: a meta-analysis. 2011 All outcomes
2 years · School · multiple-surface permanent posterior teeth, 2 years
Survival percentage 41 [18, 67]
1 study
GRADE not reported
Survival of atraumatic restorative treatment (ART) sealants and restorations: a meta-analysis. 2011 All outcomes
1 year · School · multiple-surface permanent posterior teeth, 1 year
Survival percentage 86 [59, 98]
3 studies
GRADE not reported
Survival of atraumatic restorative treatment (ART) sealants and restorations: a meta-analysis. 2011 All outcomes
5 years · School · multiple-surface permanent posterior teeth, 5 years
Survival percentage 77 [56, 92]
1 study
GRADE not reported

Restoration survival · Primary posterior teeth with multiple-surface cavities

The pooled survival rate was 62% at 2 years.

3 findings from 1 review

Survival of atraumatic restorative treatment (ART) sealants and restorations: a meta-analysis. 2011 All outcomes
2 years · School or clinic · multiple-surface primary posterior teeth, 2 years
Survival percentage 62 [51, 73]
6 studies
GRADE not reported
Survival of atraumatic restorative treatment (ART) sealants and restorations: a meta-analysis. 2011 All outcomes
1 year · School or clinic · multiple-surface primary posterior teeth, 1 year
Survival percentage 71 [60, 80]
8 studies
GRADE not reported
Survival of atraumatic restorative treatment (ART) sealants and restorations: a meta-analysis. 2011 All outcomes
3 years · School or clinic · multiple-surface primary posterior teeth, 3 years
Survival percentage 31 [2, 77]
2 studies
GRADE not reported