Findings

What do systematic reviews say?

Refine by population, intervention, comparison or outcome
More filters
Evidence found and GRADE certainty

134 questions · 149 findings · 10 reviews

No studies found 44 · 29.5%GRADE not reported 9 · 6%Very low 35 · 23.5%Low 26 · 17.4%Moderate 26 · 17.4%High 9 · 6%

Low molecular weight heparin vs active control

Total VTE · ambulatory cancer patients receiving chemotherapy

Low‐molecular‐weight heparin showed no clear difference in any VTE compared with with active control (1); GRADE not reported.

3 findings from 1 review

Low molecular weight heparin vs active control

1‐year overall mortality · ambulatory cancer patients receiving chemotherapy

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

3 findings from 1 review

Low molecular weight heparin vs active control

Clinically relevant bleeding · ambulatory cancer patients receiving chemotherapy

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

3 findings from 1 review

Heparin vs no treatment

Mortality attributable to hepatic veno‐occlusive disease ( · People undergoing autologous or HLA identical allogeneic bone marrow transplant with a variety of malignant diseases or aplastic anaemia

Summary of findings: Heparin showed no clear difference in mortality attributable to hepatic veno‐occlusive disease ( compared with no treatment (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Heparin vs no treatment

Frequency of adverse events ( · People undergoing autologous or HLA identical allogeneic bone marrow transplant with a variety of malignant diseases or aplastic anaemia

It is very uncertain whether summary of findings: Heparin changes frequency of adverse events ( compared with no treatment (very low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Heparin vs prostaglandin E1

Incidence of hepatic veno‐occlusive disease ( · Patients undergoing stem cell transplant with malignant and non‐malignant diseases

It is very uncertain whether summary of findings: Heparin changes incidence of hepatic veno‐occlusive disease ( compared with prostaglandin E1 (very low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Heparin vs prostaglandin E1

Mortality attributable to hepatic veno‐occlusive disease ( · Patients undergoing stem cell transplant with malignant and non‐malignant diseases

It is very uncertain whether summary of findings: Heparin changes mortality attributable to hepatic veno‐occlusive disease ( compared with prostaglandin E1 (very low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Heparin vs prostaglandin E1

Frequency of adverse events ( · Patients undergoing stem cell transplant with malignant and non‐malignant diseases

It is very uncertain whether summary of findings: Heparin changes frequency of adverse events ( compared with prostaglandin E1 (very low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Heparin vs no treatment

Incidence of hepatic veno‐occlusive disease ( · People undergoing autologous or HLA identical allogeneic bone marrow transplant with a variety of malignant diseases or aplastic anaemia

It is very uncertain whether summary of findings: Heparin changes incidence of hepatic veno‐occlusive disease ( compared with no treatment (very low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Heparin vs no treatment

Overall survival ( · People undergoing autologous or HLA identical allogeneic bone marrow transplant with a variety of malignant diseases or aplastic anaemia

It is very uncertain whether summary of findings: Heparin changes overall survival ( compared with no treatment (very low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Heparin vs no treatment

All‐cause mortality at 100 days post‐transplant · People undergoing autologous or HLA identical allogeneic bone marrow transplant with a variety of malignant diseases or aplastic anaemia

Summary of findings: Heparin showed no clear difference in all‐cause mortality at 100 days post‐transplant ( compared with no treatment (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review