Findings

What do systematic reviews say?

1 questions · 2 findings · 1 reviews

Sort:Best matchNewest Highest certainty Download CSV

No studies found 0 · 0%GRADE not reported 0 · 0%Very low 0 · 0%Low 0 · 0%Moderate 2 · 100%High 0 · 0%

Closest answers

The findings closest to your search, judged one by one by TypeSafe's Jev model.

Direct match · question page
- Hearing loss prevention programme vs audiometric testing (hearing loss) · Hearing loss STS ≥ 10 dB loss average over 2, 3, 4 kHz in either ear
  Interventions to prevent occupational noise‐induced hearing loss 2017 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  OR 0.85 [0.29, 2.44]
  1 study · 687 participants
  Moderate

Hearing loss prevention programme vs audiometric testing (hearing loss)

Hearing loss STS ≥ 10 dB hearing loss average over 2, 3, 4 kHz in either ear · agricultural students without hearing loss

Hearing loss prevention programme showed no clear difference in hearing loss STS ≥ 10 dB loss average over 2, 3, 4 kHz in either ear compared with audiometric testing (hearing loss) (moderate certainty).

2 findings from 1 review

Interventions to prevent occupational noise‐induced hearing loss 2017 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
OR 0.85 [0.29, 2.44]
1 study · 687 participants
Moderate
Interventions to prevent occupational noise‐induced hearing loss 2017 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
OR 0.94 [0.46, 1.91]
1 study · 355 participants
Moderate