Findings

What do systematic reviews say?

12 questions · 12 findings · 1 reviews

Sort:Best matchNewest Highest certainty Download CSV

No studies found 6 · 50%GRADE not reported 0 · 0%Very low 0 · 0%Low 1 · 8.3%Moderate 5 · 41.7%High 0 · 0%

Hand‐held mouse‐based electronic device vs optical device

Ease and frequency of use Task difficulty score (0 = very easy to use 5 = extremely difficult) · adults with low vision

1 finding from 1 review

Reading aids for adults with low vision 2018 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
1 study · 70 participants
Moderate

Hand‐held mouse‐based electronic device vs optical device

Quality of life · adults with low vision

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review

Reading aids for adults with low vision 2018 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found

Hand‐held mouse‐based electronic device vs optical device

Adverse outcomes · adults with low vision

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review

Reading aids for adults with low vision 2018 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found

Hand‐held mouse‐based electronic device vs optical device

Reading speed (words per minute) · adults with low vision

1 finding from 1 review

Reading aids for adults with low vision 2018 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
1 study · 70 participants
Moderate

Hand‐held mouse‐based electronic device vs optical device

Reading duration · adults with low vision

1 finding from 1 review

Reading aids for adults with low vision 2018 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
1 study · 22 participants
Moderate

Hand‐held mouse‐based electronic device vs optical device

Reading acuity · adults with low vision

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review

Reading aids for adults with low vision 2018 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found

Hand‐held (not mouse‐based) electronic device plus optical device vs optical device

Reading speed (words per minute) · adults with low vision

1 finding from 1 review

Reading aids for adults with low vision 2018 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
1 study · 100 participants
Moderate

Hand‐held (not mouse‐based) electronic device plus optical device vs optical device

Reading duration · adults with low vision

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review

Reading aids for adults with low vision 2018 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found

Hand‐held (not mouse‐based) electronic device plus optical device vs optical device

Reading acuity · adults with low vision

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review

Reading aids for adults with low vision 2018 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found

Hand‐held (not mouse‐based) electronic device plus optical device vs optical device

Ease and frequency of use Frequency of use (0 = never to 4 = several times a day) · adults with low vision

1 finding from 1 review

Reading aids for adults with low vision 2018 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
1 study · 100 participants
Low

Hand‐held (not mouse‐based) electronic device plus optical device vs optical device

Quality of life estimating perceived difficulty using the NV‐VFQ‐15 questionnaire · adults with low vision

1 finding from 1 review

Reading aids for adults with low vision 2018 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
1 study · 100 participants
Moderate

Hand‐held (not mouse‐based) electronic device plus optical device vs optical device

Adverse outcomes · adults with low vision

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review

Reading aids for adults with low vision 2018 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found