Hall technique vs Non-restorative caries treatment
Costs · Children with decayed primary molar teeth
The review found no eligible studies for this question.
1 finding from 1 review
- The studies did not measure this outcome.0 studiesNo studies found
Findings
What do systematic reviews say?
3 questions · 3 findings · 2 reviews
No studies found 2 · 66.7%GRADE not reported 1 · 33.3%Very low 0 · 0%Low 0 · 0%Moderate 0 · 0%High 0 · 0%
Preformed crown (any material; conventional technique or Hall Technique) vs Filling (any material; with or without complete carious tissue excavation; with or without pulp treatment)
Costs · Children with decayed primary molar teeth
The review found no eligible studies for this question.
1 finding from 1 review
- The studies did not measure this outcome.0 studiesNo studies found
Hall technique vs Non-restorative cavity control (NRCC)
Efficiency, costs or cost-effectiveness · Children and/or adults with permanent or primary teeth, vital (sensitive) pulps, and cavitated or dentine carious lesions conventionally…
1 finding from 1 review
- Interventions for treating cavitated or dentine carious lesions 2021 · Cochrane All outcomesPrimary dentitionCost-effectiveness reported narratively: HT found more cost-effective than NRCC in primary teeth (Santamaria 2018); not GRADE-rated.1 studyGRADE not reported