Findings

What do systematic reviews say?

8 questions · 8 findings · 2 reviews

Sort:Best matchNewest Highest certainty Download CSV

No studies found 0 · 0%GRADE not reported 1 · 12.5%Very low 7 · 87.5%Low 0 · 0%Moderate 0 · 0%High 0 · 0%

Glutamine (intravenous) vs placebo

Oral mucositis (severe) · Patients with cancer receiving radiotherapy, chemotherapy or targeted therapies

Glutamine (intravenous) led to lower oral mucositis (severe) compared with placebo; GRADE not reported.

1 finding from 1 review

Interventions for preventing oral mucositis for patients with cancer receiving treatment 2011 · Cochrane All outcomes
Median 28 days
RR 0.25 [0.1, 0.62]
3 studies · 93 participants
GRADE not reported

Enteral nutrition via nasojejunal tube plus intravenous glutamine‐dipeptide supplementation vs parenteral nutrition

All‐cause mortality during hospital stay · adult patients after liver transplantation.

It is very uncertain whether enteral nutrition via nasojejunal tube plus intravenous… changes death (during length of initial hospital stay; ITT) compared with standard parenteral nutrition (very low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Nutritional interventions for liver‐transplanted patients 2012 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
1 study · 30 participants
Very low

Enteral nutrition via nasojejunal tube plus intravenous glutamine‐dipeptide supplementation vs parenteral nutrition

Infection (ITT) ‐ mycotic infection · adult patients after liver transplantation.

It is very uncertain whether enteral nutrition via nasojejunal tube plus intravenous… changes infection (ITT) ‐ mycotic infection compared with standard parenteral nutrition (very low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Nutritional interventions for liver‐transplanted patients 2012 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
OR 0.19 [0.02, 1.31]
1 study · 30 participants
Very low

Enteral nutrition via nasojejunal tube plus intravenous glutamine‐dipeptide supplementation vs parenteral nutrition

Infection (ITT) ‐ infection (overall) · adult patients after liver transplantation.

It is very uncertain whether enteral nutrition via nasojejunal tube plus intravenous… changes infection (ITT) ‐ infection (overall) compared with standard parenteral nutrition (very low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Nutritional interventions for liver‐transplanted patients 2012 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
OR 0.35 [0.06, 1.84]
1 study · 30 participants
Very low

Enteral nutrition via nasojejunal tube plus intravenous glutamine‐dipeptide supplementation vs parenteral nutrition

Acute rejection · adult patients after liver transplantation.

It is very uncertain whether enteral nutrition via nasojejunal tube plus intravenous… changes acute rejection (ITT) compared with standard parenteral nutrition (very low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Nutritional interventions for liver‐transplanted patients 2012 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
OR 0.21 [0.004, 2.49]
1 study · 30 participants
Very low

Enteral nutrition via nasojejunal tube plus intravenous glutamine‐dipeptide supplementation vs parenteral nutrition

Length of hospital stay after liver transplantation [days] · adult patients after liver transplantation.

1 finding from 1 review

Nutritional interventions for liver‐transplanted patients 2012 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
1 study · 30 participants
Very low

Enteral nutrition via nasojejunal tube plus intravenous glutamine‐dipeptide supplementation vs parenteral nutrition

Intensive care unit length of stay after liver transplantation [days] (ITT) · adult patients after liver transplantation.

1 finding from 1 review

Nutritional interventions for liver‐transplanted patients 2012 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
1 study · 30 participants
Very low

Enteral nutrition via nasojejunal tube plus intravenous glutamine‐dipeptide supplementation vs parenteral nutrition

Days on ventilator · adult patients after liver transplantation.

1 finding from 1 review

Nutritional interventions for liver‐transplanted patients 2012 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
1 study · 30 participants
Very low