Findings

What do systematic reviews say?

3 questions · 4 findings · 1 reviews

Sort:Best matchNewest Highest certainty Download CSV

No studies found 2 · 50%GRADE not reported 0 · 0%Very low 1 · 25%Low 0 · 0%Moderate 1 · 25%High 0 · 0%

General anaesthesia vs non‐general anaesthesia

Target artery revascularisation status · acute ischaemic stroke endovascular treatment (long‐term)

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review

Type of anaesthesia for acute ischaemic stroke endovascular treatment 2022 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found

General anaesthesia vs non‐general anaesthesia

Time to revascularisation · acute ischaemic stroke endovascular treatment (long‐term)

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

2 findings from 1 review

Type of anaesthesia for acute ischaemic stroke endovascular treatment 2022 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found
Type of anaesthesia for acute ischaemic stroke endovascular treatment 2022 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
5 studies · 498 participants
Very low

General anaesthesia vs non‐general anaesthesia

Target artery revascularisation (dichotomous; mTICI 2b–3) · acute ischaemic stroke endovascular treatment (long‐term)

General anaesthesia probably leads to higher target artery revascularisation (dichotomous; mTICI 2b–3) compared with non‐general anaesthesia (moderate certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Type of anaesthesia for acute ischaemic stroke endovascular treatment 2022 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
RR 1.1 [1.02, 1.18]
7 studies · 982 participants
Moderate