foam dressing vs paraffin gauze
Adverse events · people with venous leg ulcers
1 finding from 1 review
- no estimate extracted0 studies · 0 participantsGRADE not reported
Findings
What do systematic reviews say?
11 questions · 11 findings · 3 reviews
No studies found 0 · 0%GRADE not reported 3 · 27.3%Very low 3 · 27.3%Low 5 · 45.5%Moderate 0 · 0%High 0 · 0%
foam dressing vs alginate dressing
Adverse events · people with diabetes and foot ulcers
1 finding from 1 review
- no estimate extracted0 studies · 1 participantsGRADE not reported
foam dressing vs hydrocolloid dressing
Adverse events · people with diabetes and foot ulcers
1 finding from 1 review
- no estimate extracted0 studies · 1 participantsGRADE not reported
foam dressing vs hydrogel dressing
Adverse events, short‐term · people of any age with an existing pressure ulcer of Category/Stage II or above
It is very uncertain whether foam dressing changes adverse events, short‐term compared with hydrogel dressing (very low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
- RR 0.33 [0.01, 7.65]1 study · 34 participantsVery low
foam dressing vs hydrocolloid dressing
Adverse events, short‐term · people of any age with an existing pressure ulcer of Category/Stage II or above
It is very uncertain whether foam dressings changes adverse events, short‐term compared with hydrocolloid dressings (very low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
- RR 0.88 [0.37, 2.11]3 studies · 198 participantsVery low
foam dressing vs basic wound contact dressing
Adverse effect/event: 2. Adverse effects ‐ any ‐ medium‐termonly · people of any age with an existing pressure ulcer of Category/Stage II or above
Foam dressings showed no clear difference in adverse events, medium‐term compared with basic contact dressings (low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
- RR 0.58 [0.33, 1.05]1 study · 95 participantsLow
foam dressing vs hydrocapillary dressing
Proportion of participants experiencing adverse events · people with venous leg ulcers
foam dressing showed no clear difference in proportion of participants experiencing adverse events compared with hydrocapillary dressing (low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
- RR 1.4 [0.62, 3.18]1 study · 97 participantsLow
foam dressing vs hydrocolloid dressing
Proportion of participants experiencing adverse events · people with venous leg ulcers
foam dressing showed no clear difference in proportion of participants experiencing adverse events compared with hydrocolloid dressing (low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
- RR 1.22 [0.64, 2.31]1 study · 107 participantsLow
foam dressing vs knitted viscose dressing
Proportion of participants experiencing adverse events · people with venous leg ulcers
foam dressing showed no clear difference in proportion of participants experiencing adverse events compared with knitted viscose dressing (low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
- RR 5 [0.24, 102.19]1 study · 132 participantsLow
Hydropolymer foam dressing vs silicone foam dressing
Adverse events, short‐term · people of any age with an existing pressure ulcer of Category/Stage II or above
It is very uncertain whether hydropolymer foam dressing changes adverse events, short‐term compared with silicone foam dressing (very low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
- RR 0.37 [0.04, 3.25]1 study · 38 participantsVery low
polyurethane foam dressing vs hydrocellular foam dressing
Proportion of participants experiencing adverse events · people with venous leg ulcers
polyurethane foam dressing showed no clear difference in proportion of participants experiencing adverse events compared with hydrocellular foam dressing (low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
- RR 1.13 [0.69, 1.85]1 study · 156 participantsLow