Findings

What do systematic reviews say?

3 questions · 3 findings · 1 reviews

Sort:Best matchNewest Highest certainty Download CSV

No studies found 0 · 0%GRADE not reported 3 · 100%Very low 0 · 0%Low 0 · 0%Moderate 0 · 0%High 0 · 0%

Fluoride in rinse vs no treatment

Caries increment, surface index D(M)FS · Children or adolescents

In the illustrative network meta-regression the SMD for caries increment differed between fluoride in rinse and no treatment at every displayed randomization year; certainty was not graded.

1 finding from 1 review

Graphs of study contributions and covariate distributions for network meta-regression. 2018 All outcomes
At least 1 year or school year · Network meta-regression covariate: randomization year
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
GRADE not reported

Fluoride in rinse vs Fluoride in dentifrice

Caries increment, surface index D(M)FS · Children or adolescents

The illustrative network meta-regression estimated an SMD for caries increment for fluoride in rinse versus fluoride in dentifrice across randomization year; the review did not state whether the difference was significant and certainty was not graded.

1 finding from 1 review

Graphs of study contributions and covariate distributions for network meta-regression. 2018 All outcomes
At least 1 year or school year · Network meta-regression covariate: randomization year
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
GRADE not reported

Fluoride in rinse vs placebo

Caries increment, surface index D(M)FS · Children or adolescents

In the illustrative network meta-regression the SMD for caries increment differed between fluoride in rinse and placebo at randomization years 1954 to 1990; certainty was not graded.

1 finding from 1 review

Graphs of study contributions and covariate distributions for network meta-regression. 2018 All outcomes
At least 1 year or school year · Network meta-regression covariate: randomization year
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
GRADE not reported